Suppr超能文献

中国城乡人口中固体燃料使用与吸烟对30岁时预期寿命的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究

Impacts of solid fuel use versus smoking on life expectancy at age 30 years in the rural and urban Chinese population: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Sun Qiufen, Sun Dong, Yu Canqing, Guo Yu, Sun Dianjianyi, Pei Pei, Yang Ling, Chen Yiping, Du Huaidong, Schmidt Dan, Stevens Rebecca, Kang Kai, Chen Junshi, Chen Zhengming, Li Liming, Lv Jun

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.

Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness & Response, Beijing, 100191, China.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Feb 13;32:100705. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100705. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of solid fuel use on life expectancy (LE) in less-developed countries remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the potential impact of household solid fuel use on LE in the rural and urban Chinese population, with the effect of smoking as a reference.

METHODS

We used data from China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) of 484,915 participants aged 30-79 free of coronary heart disease, stroke, or cancer at baseline. Analyses were performed separately for solid fuel use for cooking, solid fuel use for heating, and smoking, with participants exposed to the other two sources excluded. Solid fuels refer to coal and wood, and clean fuels refer to electricity, gas, and central heating. We used a flexible parametric Royston-Parmar model to estimate hazard ratios of all-cause mortality and predict LE at age 30.

FINDINGS

Totally, 185,077, 95,228, and 230,995 participants were included in cooking-, heating-, and smoking-related analyses, respectively. During a median follow-up of approximately 12.1 years, 12,725, 7,531, and 18,878 deaths were recorded in the respective analysis. Compared with clean fuel users who reported cooking with ventilation, participants who used solid fuels with ventilation and without ventilation had a difference in LE (95% confidence interval [CI]) at age 30 of -1.72 (-2.88, -0.57) and -2.62 (-4.16, -1.05) years for men and -1.33 (-1.85, -0.81) and -1.35 (-2.02, -0.67) years for women, respectively. The difference in LE (95% CI) for heating was -2.23 (-3.51, -0.95) years for men and -1.28 (-2.08, -0.48) years for women. In rural men, the LE reduction (95% CI) related to solid fuel use for cooking (-2.55; -4.51, -0.58) or heating (-3.26; -6.09, 0.44) was more than that related to smoking (-1.71; -2.54, -0.89). Conversely, in urban men, the LE reduction (95% CI) related to smoking (-3.06; -3.56, -2.56) was more than that related to solid fuel use for cooking (-1.28; -2.61, 0.05) and heating (-1.90; -3.16, -0.65). Similar results were observed in women but with a smaller magnitude.

INTERPRETATION

In this Chinese population, the harm to LE from household use of solid fuels was greater than that from smoking in rural residents. Conversely, the negative impact of smoking was greater than solid fuel use in urban residents. Our findings highlight the complexity and diversity of the factors affecting LE in less-developed populations.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key R&D Program of China, Kadoorie Charitable Foundation, UK Wellcome Trust.

摘要

背景

在欠发达国家,使用固体燃料对预期寿命(LE)的影响仍不明确。我们旨在评估中国城乡居民家庭使用固体燃料对预期寿命的潜在影响,并以吸烟的影响作为参照。

方法

我们使用了中国生物样本库(CKB)中484,915名年龄在30 - 79岁之间、基线时无冠心病、中风或癌症的参与者的数据。分别对烹饪用固体燃料、取暖用固体燃料和吸烟情况进行分析,排除接触其他两种来源的参与者。固体燃料指煤炭和木材,清洁燃料指电力、燃气和集中供暖。我们使用灵活的参数化Royston - Parmar模型来估计全因死亡率的风险比,并预测30岁时的预期寿命。

结果

总共分别有185,077、95,228和230,995名参与者纳入烹饪、取暖和吸烟相关分析。在约12.1年的中位随访期内,各分析中分别记录了12,725、7,531和18,878例死亡。与报告烹饪时有通风的清洁燃料使用者相比,使用有通风和无通风固体燃料的参与者在30岁时的预期寿命差异(95%置信区间[CI]),男性分别为-1.72(-2.88,-0.57)年和-2.62(-4.16,-1.05)年,女性分别为-1.33(-1.85,-0.81)年和-1.35(-2.02,-0.67)年。取暖导致的预期寿命差异(95% CI),男性为-2.23(-3.51,-0.95)年,女性为-1.28(-2.08,-0.48)年。在农村男性中,烹饪(-2.55;-4.51,-0.58)或取暖(-3.26;-6.09,0.44)使用固体燃料导致的预期寿命缩短超过吸烟(-1.71;-2.54,-0.89)。相反,在城市男性中,吸烟(-3.06;-3.56,-2.56)导致的预期寿命缩短超过烹饪(-1.28;-2.61,0.05)和取暖(-1.90;-3.16,-0.65)使用固体燃料。女性中观察到类似结果,但幅度较小。

解读

在该中国人群中,农村居民家庭使用固体燃料对预期寿命的危害大于吸烟。相反,城市居民中吸烟的负面影响大于使用固体燃料。我们的研究结果凸显了欠发达人群中影响预期寿命因素的复杂性和多样性。

资助

中国国家自然科学基金、中国国家重点研发计划、嘉道理慈善基金会、英国惠康信托基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6798/9942113/ee914eb68eb2/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验