Mid-Michigan Eye Care, Midland, Michigan.
Southern California College of Optometry, Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, California.
Optom Vis Sci. 2023 May 1;100(5):312-318. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002013. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Vision rehabilitation providers tend to recommend handheld, illuminated optical magnifiers for short-duration spot reading tasks, but this study indicates that they are also a viable option to improve sustained, continuous text reading (e.g., books or magazines), especially for visually impaired adults who read slowly with only spectacle-based near correction.
The utility of handheld optical magnifiers for sustained silent reading tasks involving normal-sized continuous text could be a valuable indication that is not recognized by vision rehabilitation providers and patients.
Handheld, illuminated optical magnifiers were dispensed to 29 visually impaired adults who completed the sustained silent reading test by phone at baseline without the new magnifier and 1 month after using the magnifier. Reading speed in words per minute (wpm) was calculated from the time to read each page and then averaged across up to 10 pages or determined for the fastest read page (maximum).
From baseline without the magnifier to 1 month with the magnifier, there was a significant improvement in mean reading speed by 14 wpm (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 24; P = .02) and for maximum reading speed by 18 wpm (95% CI, 5.4 to 30; P = .005) on average across participants. Participants who had slower baseline reading speeds without the magnifier demonstrated significantly greater improvements in mean and maximum reading speeds on average with the magnifier (95% CI, 8 to 32 [ P = .003]; 95% CI, 4 to 36 [ P = .02]). A significantly greater number of pages were read with the new magnifier than without it (Wilcoxon z = -2.5; P = .01). A significantly greater number of pages were read with the magnifier by participants who read fewer pages at baseline (95% CI, 0.57 to 5.6; P = .02) or had greater improvements in mean reading speed (95% CI, 0.57 to 5.6; P = .007).
Many visually impaired adults read more quickly and/or read a greater number of pages after using a new magnifier for a month than compared to without it. The largest gains occurred among those with more difficulty at baseline, indicating the potential to improve reading rates with magnifiers for those with greater deficits.
视力康复提供者倾向于推荐手持式、带照明的光学放大镜用于短时间的点读任务,但这项研究表明,对于仅使用基于眼镜的近距矫正而阅读速度较慢的视障成年人,它们也是改善持续、连续文本阅读(例如书籍或杂志)的可行选择。
手持式光学放大镜在涉及正常大小的连续文本的持续默读任务中的实用性可能是一个重要的迹象,但视力康复提供者和患者并未认识到这一点。
为 29 名视障成年人配发了手持式、带照明的光学放大镜,他们在基线时通过电话完成了持续默读测试,没有使用新的放大镜,然后在使用放大镜一个月后再次进行测试。每分钟阅读的字数(wpm)是根据阅读每页所需的时间计算的,然后在最多 10 页的阅读中进行平均,或者确定最快的阅读页数(最大值)。
从基线时不使用放大镜到使用放大镜一个月后,参与者的平均阅读速度提高了 14 wpm(95%置信区间[CI],2.6 到 24;P =.02),最大阅读速度提高了 18 wpm(95% CI,5.4 到 30;P =.005)。基线时阅读速度较慢的参与者在使用放大镜时,平均阅读速度的提高更为显著(95% CI,8 到 32 [P =.003];95% CI,4 到 36 [P =.02])。使用新放大镜后,参与者阅读的页数明显增加(Wilcoxon z = -2.5;P =.01)。与基线时阅读较少页数的参与者相比(95% CI,0.57 到 5.6;P =.02)或阅读速度平均提高较大的参与者相比(95% CI,0.57 到 5.6;P =.007),使用放大镜后,参与者阅读的页数更多。
许多视障成年人在使用新放大镜一个月后,阅读速度更快,或者阅读的页数更多,与不使用放大镜相比。最大的收益出现在基线时困难较大的人群中,这表明对于有更大阅读障碍的人来说,使用放大镜提高阅读速度是有潜力的。