Centre for Sustainable Disinfection and Sterilization, Bioscience Research Institute, Technological University of the Shannon Midlands Midwest, Athlone Campus, Ireland; Department of Nursing and Healthcare, Technological University of the Shannon Midwest Mideast, Athlone Campus, Ireland; SFI-funded CURAM Centre for Medical Device Research, University of Galway, Ireland.
Centre for Sustainable Disinfection and Sterilization, Bioscience Research Institute, Technological University of the Shannon Midlands Midwest, Athlone Campus, Ireland; Microbiological Quality & Sterility Assurance, Johnson & Johnson, 1000 Route 202, South Raritan, NJ 08869, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 20;878:162976. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162976. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Despite advances in medicine and innovations in many underpinning fields including disease prevention and control, the Spaulding classification system, originally proposed in 1957, remains widely used for defining the disinfection and sterilization of contaminated re-usable medical devices and surgical instruments. Screening PubMed and Scopus databases using a PRISMA guiding framework generated 272 relevant publications that were used in this review. Findings revealed that there is a need to evolve how medical devices are designed, and processed by cleaning, disinfection (and/or sterilization) to mitigate patient risks, including acquiring an infection. This Spaulding Classification remains in use as it is logical, easily applied and understood by users (microbiologists, epidemiologists, manufacturers, industry) and by regulators. However, substantial changes have occurred over the past 65 years that challenge interpretation and application of this system that includes inter alia emergence of new pathogens (viruses, mycobacteria, protozoa, fungi), a greater understanding of innate and adaptive microbial tolerance to disinfection, toxicity risks, increased number of vulnerable patients and associated patient procedures, and greater complexity in design and use of medical devices. Common cited examples include endoscopes that enable non- or minimal invasive procedures but are highly sophisticated with various types of materials (polymers, electronic components etc), long narrow channels, right angle and heat-sensitive components and various accessories (e.g., values) that can be contaminated with high levels of microbial bioburden and patient tissues after use. Contaminated flexible duodenoscopes have been a source of several significant infection outbreaks, where at least 9 reported cases were caused by multidrug resistant organisms [MDROs] with no obvious breach in processing detected. Despite this, there is evidence of the lack of attention to cleaning and maintenance of these devices and associated equipment. Over the last few decades there is increasing genomic evidence of innate and adaptive resistance to chemical disinfectant methods along with adaptive tolerance to environmental stresses. To reduce these risks, it has been proposed to elevate classification of higher-risk flexible endoscopes (such as duodenoscopes) from semi-critical [contact with mucous membrane and intact skin] to critical use [contact with sterile tissue and blood] that entails a transition to using low-temperature sterilization modalities instead of routinely using high-level disinfection; thus, increasing the margin of safety for endoscope processing. This timely review addresses important issues surrounding use of the Spaulding classification system to meet modern-day needs. It specifically addresses the need for automated, robust cleaning and drying methods combined with using real-time monitoring of device processing. There is a need to understand entire end-to-end processing of devices instead of adopting silo approaches that in the future will be informed by artificial intelligence and deep-learning/machine learning. For example, combinational solutions that address the formation of complex biofilms that harbour pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms on the surfaces of processed devices. Emerging trends are addressed including future sustainability for the medical devices sector that can be enabled via a new Quintuple Helix Hub approach that combines academia, industry, healthcare, regulators, and society to unlock real world solutions.
尽管医学取得了进步,许多基础领域的创新也取得了进展,包括疾病预防和控制,但 1957 年最初提出的斯鲍尔丁分类系统仍然广泛用于定义污染的可重复使用医疗器械和手术器械的消毒和灭菌。使用 PRISMA 指导框架筛选 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库,生成了 272 篇相关出版物,用于本综述。研究结果表明,需要改进医疗器械的设计和处理方式,通过清洗、消毒(和/或灭菌)来降低患者风险,包括感染风险。该斯鲍尔丁分类系统仍在使用,因为它具有逻辑性,易于被用户(微生物学家、流行病学家、制造商、行业)和监管机构理解和应用。然而,在过去的 65 年里,发生了许多重大变化,这对该系统的解释和应用提出了挑战,包括新病原体(病毒、分枝杆菌、原生动物、真菌)的出现,对微生物对消毒的固有和适应性耐受性、毒性风险、脆弱患者数量的增加以及相关患者程序的认识的提高,以及医疗器械设计和使用的复杂性的增加。常见的例子包括能够进行非侵入性或最小侵入性手术的内窥镜,但它们非常复杂,有各种类型的材料(聚合物、电子元件等)、长而窄的通道、直角和热敏元件以及各种附件(例如阀值),在使用后可能会被高水平的微生物生物负荷和患者组织污染。污染的软性十二指肠镜一直是几次重大感染爆发的源头,至少有 9 例报告的病例是由多药耐药菌引起的,没有发现明显的处理漏洞。尽管如此,仍有证据表明人们对这些设备和相关设备的清洗和维护不够重视。在过去几十年中,越来越多的基因组证据表明,微生物对化学消毒剂的固有和适应性耐药性以及对环境压力的适应性耐受性。为了降低这些风险,有人提议将风险较高的软性内窥镜(如十二指肠镜)的分类从半关键(接触粘膜和完整皮肤)提升为关键用途(接触无菌组织和血液),这需要过渡到使用低温灭菌方式,而不是常规使用高水平消毒;从而增加内窥镜处理的安全裕度。本及时审查针对满足现代需求而使用斯鲍尔丁分类系统的重要问题。它特别解决了对自动化、强大的清洗和干燥方法的需求,同时结合对设备处理的实时监测。需要了解设备整个端到端的处理过程,而不是采用筒仓方法,筒仓方法在未来将由人工智能和深度学习/机器学习提供信息。例如,组合解决方案可解决在处理设备表面形成的复杂生物膜问题,这些生物膜中存在致病性和机会性微生物。本综述还探讨了新兴趋势,包括通过结合学术界、工业界、医疗保健、监管机构和社会的新五螺旋中心方法,为医疗器械行业提供未来的可持续性,以解锁现实世界的解决方案。