Institute of Education Research (TIER), University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Pain. 2023 Oct 1;164(10):2148-2190. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002911. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
Interpatient variability is frequently observed among individuals with chronic low back pain (cLBP). This review aimed at identifying phenotypic domains and characteristics that account for interpatient variability in cLBP. We searched MEDLINE ALL (through Ovid), Embase Classic and EMBASE (through Ovid), Scopus, and CINAHL Complete (through EBSCOhost) databases. Studies that aimed to identify or predict cLBP different phenotypes were included. We excluded studies that focused on specific treatments. The methodological quality was assessed using an adaptation of the Downs and Black tool. Forty-three studies were included. Although the patient and pain-related characteristics used to identify phenotypes varied considerably across studies, the following were among the most identified phenotypic domains and characteristics that account for interpatient variability in cLBP: pain-related characteristics (including location, severity, qualities, and duration) and pain impact (including disability, sleep, and fatigue), psychological domains (including anxiety and depression), behavioral domains (including coping, somatization, fear avoidance, and catastrophizing), social domains (including employment and social support), and sensory profiling (including pain sensitivity and sensitization). Despite these findings, our review showed that the evidence on pain phenotyping still requires further investigation. The assessment of the methodological quality revealed several limitations. We recommend adopting a standard methodology to enhance the generalizability of the results and the implementation of a comprehensive and feasible assessment framework to facilitate personalized treatments in clinical settings.
慢性下背痛(cLBP)患者个体间存在明显的异质性。本综述旨在确定表型特征和临床特征,以解释 cLBP 患者个体间的异质性。我们检索了 MEDLINE ALL(通过 Ovid)、Embase Classic 和 EMBASE(通过 Ovid)、Scopus 和 CINAHL Complete(通过 EBSCOhost)数据库。纳入旨在识别或预测 cLBP 不同表型的研究。排除专注于特定治疗的研究。采用 Downs 和 Black 工具的改编版评估方法学质量。共纳入 43 项研究。尽管用于识别表型的患者和疼痛相关特征在研究间差异很大,但以下是 cLBP 患者个体间异质性的主要表型特征和临床特征:疼痛相关特征(包括位置、严重程度、性质和持续时间)和疼痛影响(包括残疾、睡眠和疲劳)、心理领域(包括焦虑和抑郁)、行为领域(包括应对、躯体化、恐惧回避和灾难化)、社会领域(包括就业和社会支持)和感觉特征(包括疼痛敏感性和敏化)。尽管有这些发现,但我们的综述表明,疼痛表型的证据仍需要进一步研究。方法学质量评估显示存在一些局限性。我们建议采用标准方法学来提高结果的可推广性,并实施全面可行的评估框架,以促进临床实践中的个体化治疗。