Suppr超能文献

TSCA 下邻苯二甲酸酯的累积风险评估。

Cumulative Risk Evaluation of Phthalates Under TSCA.

机构信息

Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, 255 Valley Drive, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.

University of Rochester School of Medicine, Box EHSC, Rochester, New York 14642, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Apr 25;57(16):6403-6414. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08364. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently conducting separate Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) risk evaluations for seven phthalates: dibutyl phthalate (DBP), butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP), di-isodecyl phthalate (DIDP), and diisononyl phthalate (DINP). Phthalates are highly abundant plastic additives used primarily to soften materials and make them flexible, and biomonitoring shows widespread human exposure to a mixture of phthalates. Evidence supports biological additivity of phthalate mixture exposures, including the enhancement of toxicity affecting common biological targets. Risk estimates based on individual phthalate exposure may not be protective of public health. Thus, a cumulative risk approach is warranted. While EPA initially did not signal that it would incorporate cumulative risk assessment (CRA) as part of its current risk evaluation for the seven phthalates, the agency recently announced that it is reconsidering if CRA for phthalates would be appropriate. Based on our review of existing chemical mixtures risk assessment guidance, current TSCA scoping documents for the seven phthalates, and pertinent peer-reviewed literature, we delineate a CRA approach that EPA can easily implement for phthalates. The strategy for using CRA to inform TSCA risk evaluation for existing chemicals is based upon integrative physiology and a common adverse health outcome algorithm for identifying and grouping relevant nonchemical and chemical stressors. We recommend adjustments for how hazard indices (HIs) or margins of exposure (MOEs) based on CRA are interpreted for determining "unreasonable risk" under TSCA.

摘要

美国环保署 (EPA) 目前正在对七种邻苯二甲酸盐(DBP、BBP、DEHP、DIBP、DCHP、DIDP 和 DINP)进行单独的《有毒物质控制法》(TSCA)风险评估。邻苯二甲酸盐是大量使用的塑料添加剂,主要用于软化材料并使其具有柔韧性,生物监测显示人类广泛接触到邻苯二甲酸盐混合物。有证据表明,邻苯二甲酸盐混合物暴露具有生物学相加性,包括对常见生物学靶标的毒性增强。基于个别邻苯二甲酸盐暴露的风险估计可能无法保护公众健康。因此,需要采用累积风险方法。虽然 EPA 最初并未表示将包含累积风险评估 (CRA) 作为其当前对这七种邻苯二甲酸盐的风险评估的一部分,但该机构最近宣布正在重新考虑对邻苯二甲酸盐进行 CRA 是否合适。根据我们对现有的化学混合物风险评估指南、七种邻苯二甲酸盐的现行 TSCA 范围文件以及相关的同行评议文献的审查,我们制定了 EPA 可以轻松为邻苯二甲酸盐实施的 CRA 方法。使用 CRA 为现有化学品的 TSCA 风险评估提供信息的策略基于综合生理学和用于识别和分组相关非化学和化学应激源的常见不良健康后果算法。我们建议调整如何解释基于 CRA 的危害指数 (HI) 或暴露量倍数 (MOE),以确定 TSCA 下的“不合理风险”。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验