Suppr超能文献

美国 2018-2020 年电子烟广告中的尼古丁相关内容。

Nicotine-related content in English language ENDS advertisements in the US: 2018-2020.

机构信息

Dept of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States; Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.

Dept of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2023 Jun;171:107513. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107513. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

Abstract

There is no standard way to communicate to consumers how much nicotine is present in electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). This study assessed the inclusion of nicotine-related content, including nicotine strength, in a sample of English language ENDS advertisements that appeared in consumer and business-to-business outlets in the US during 2018-2020. The sample, provided by a media surveillance company, included ads from television, radio, newspapers, magazines (consumer and business-to-business), online platforms, outdoor/billboards, and direct-to-consumer emails. We coded for the presence of nicotine-related content (excluding FDA-required warnings) including nicotine strength presentation, such as mg, mg/ml and percent. The sample included 2966 unique ads, of which 33% (n = 979) featured nicotine-related content. The proportion of ads in the entire sample with nicotine-related content differed by manufacturer/retailer. Ads for Logic e-cigarettes had the highest proportion of nicotine content (62%, n = 258), while ads for JUUL and Vapor4Life had the lowest proportion (13.0% (n = 95) and 19.8% (n = 65), respectively). The proportion of ads with nicotine-related content also differed by media outlet: B2B magazines: 64.8% (n = 68); emails: 41% (n = 529); consumer magazines: 30.4% (n = 41); online: 25.3% (n = 227); television: 20% (n = 6); radio: 19.1% (n = 89); and outdoor (0%, n = 0). Across the sample of ads, 15% reported nicotine strength in mg or mg/ml (n = 444), and 9% reported nicotine strength in percent (n = 260). Most ENDS ads do not include nicotine-related content. There is substantial variation in presentation of nicotine strength, which may present challenges for consumer understanding of absolute and relative nicotine-related content.

摘要

目前没有向消费者传达电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)中尼古丁含量的标准方法。本研究评估了 2018 年至 2020 年期间,在美国的消费者和企业对企业销售点出现的英文 ENDS 广告中尼古丁相关内容(包括尼古丁强度)的纳入情况。样本由一家媒体监测公司提供,包括电视、广播、报纸、杂志(消费者和企业对企业)、在线平台、户外/广告牌和直接面向消费者的电子邮件中的广告。我们对尼古丁相关内容的存在情况进行了编码(不包括 FDA 要求的警告),包括尼古丁强度表示,如 mg、mg/ml 和百分比。该样本包括 2966 个独特的广告,其中 33%(n=979)包含尼古丁相关内容。整个样本中带有尼古丁相关内容的广告比例因制造商/零售商而异。Logic 电子烟广告的尼古丁含量比例最高(62%,n=258),而 JUUL 和 Vapor4Life 广告的尼古丁含量比例最低(分别为 13.0%(n=95)和 19.8%(n=65))。带有尼古丁相关内容的广告比例也因媒体渠道而异:B2B 杂志:64.8%(n=68);电子邮件:41%(n=529);消费者杂志:30.4%(n=41);在线:25.3%(n=227);电视:20%(n=6);广播:19.1%(n=89);户外(0%,n=0)。在整个广告样本中,有 15%的广告以 mg 或 mg/ml 的形式报告尼古丁强度(n=444),有 9%的广告以百分比的形式报告尼古丁强度(n=260)。大多数 ENDS 广告不包含尼古丁相关内容。尼古丁强度的呈现方式存在很大差异,这可能给消费者理解绝对和相对尼古丁含量带来挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验