Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Blood Adv. 2023 Jul 25;7(14):3739-3748. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010026.
CANDOR (NCT03158688) is a phase 3, randomized, open-label trial comparing carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) vs carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) in adults with relapsed/refectory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 1 to 3 prior therapies. The CANDOR study met its primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) in the primary analysis. Here, we report the final analysis of the study, including secondary end points and subgroup analyses thereof. The median follow-up was 50 months. Patients treated with KdD had higher minimal residual disease-negative (MRD-) achievement rates (28% vs 9%; odds ratio [OR], 4.22; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.28-7.83) and MRD- complete response rates (22% vs 8%; OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.83-6.88) than those treated with Kd. Median PFS was 28.4 months for KdD vs 15.2 months for Kd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.83). Median overall survival (OS) for KdD was 50.8 months vs 43.6 months for Kd (HR, 0.78 [0.60-1.03]; P = .042). Trends toward improved OS occurred in predefined subgroups, including patients refractory to lenalidomide (KdD, not reached vs Kd, 38.2 months; HR, 0.69 [0.43-1.11]) and refractory to proteasome inhibitor (KdD, 43.2 months vs Kd, 30.0 months; HR, 0.70 [0.45-1.09]), and there was significant improvement in patients with high-risk cytogenetics (KdD, 34.3 months vs Kd: 17.1 months; HR, 0.52 [0.29-0.94]). No new safety signals were identified. In summary, the final analysis of CANDOR confirmed the PFS benefit and showed a trend in OS benefit with KdD vs Kd. These findings reinforce KdD as a standard of care for RRMM, especially in clinically relevant patient subgroups. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03158688.
CANDOR(NCT03158688)是一项 3 期、随机、开放性试验,比较了卡非佐米、达雷妥尤单抗和地塞米松(KdD)与卡非佐米和地塞米松(Kd)在既往接受过 1 至 3 线治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)成人患者中的疗效。CANDOR 研究在主要分析中达到了无进展生存期(PFS)的主要终点。在此,我们报告了该研究的最终分析结果,包括次要终点及其亚组分析。中位随访时间为 50 个月。与 Kd 治疗组相比,KdD 治疗组的微小残留病灶阴性(MRD-)缓解率更高(28% vs 9%;优势比[OR],4.22;95%置信区间[95%CI],2.28-7.83)和 MRD-完全缓解率更高(22% vs 8%;OR,3.55;95%CI,1.83-6.88)。KdD 组的中位 PFS 为 28.4 个月,Kd 组为 15.2 个月(HR,0.64;95%CI,0.49-0.83)。KdD 组的中位总生存期(OS)为 50.8 个月,Kd 组为 43.6 个月(HR,0.78 [0.60-1.03];P=0.042)。在预先设定的亚组中,OS 有改善趋势,包括对来那度胺耐药的患者(KdD,未达到 vs Kd,38.2 个月;HR,0.69 [0.43-1.11])和对蛋白酶体抑制剂耐药的患者(KdD,43.2 个月 vs Kd,30.0 个月;HR,0.70 [0.45-1.09]),高危细胞遗传学患者的 OS 显著改善(KdD,34.3 个月 vs Kd,17.1 个月;HR,0.52 [0.29-0.94])。未发现新的安全性信号。总之,CANDOR 的最终分析结果证实了 KdD 与 Kd 相比在 PFS 方面的获益,并显示出在 OS 方面的获益趋势。这些发现强化了 KdD 作为 RRMM 治疗标准的地位,特别是在有临床意义的患者亚组中。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,编号为 #NCT03158688。