From the Centre Hospitalier de Niort, Niort, France (CA-L); Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain (ÁM-G, HB-A, DS-M, NC-S, JA-C); Biomechanical and Technical Aids Unit, National Hospital for Paraplegia, Finca La Peraleda, Spain (ÁM-G); and Water & Health Research Group (GIAS), Spain (RA-F).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 1;103(2):89-98. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002286. Epub 2023 May 15.
The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in reducing pain, improving functionality, joint range of motion, quality of life, fatigue, and health status self-perception in people with myofascial pain syndrome.
PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched for only randomized clinical trials published up to June 2, 2022. The main outcome variables were pain, as reported on the visual analog scale and pressure pain threshold, and functionality. A quantitative analysis was conducted using the inverse variance method and the random effects model.
Twenty-seven studies were included ( N = 595 participants in the extracorporeal shockwave therapy group). The effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for relieving pain was superior for the extracorporeal shockwave therapy group compared with the control group on the visual analog scale (MD = -1.7 cm; 95% confidence interval = -2.2 to -1.1) and pressure pain threshold (mean difference = 1.1 kg/cm 2 ; 95% confidence interval = 0.4 to 1.7) and functionality (standardized mean difference = -0.8; 95% confidence interval = -1.6 to -0.04) with high heterogeneity. However, no differences were found between extracorporeal shockwave therapy and other interventions as dry needling, exercises, infiltrations, and lasers interventions.
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy is effective in relieving pain and improving functionality in patients with myofascial pain syndrome compared with control and ultrasound therapy.
Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.
Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.
Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Determine the effectiveness of radial and focal extracorporeal shockwaves on pain perception, the pressure pain threshold, and functionality in people with myofascial pain syndrome; (2) Describe the intervention protocol of extracorporeal shockwave therapy to improve pain perception in people with myofascial pain syndrome; and (3) Describe the advantages and disadvantages of extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus other intervention such as dry needling.
Advanced.
The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Advanced.
The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
本研究旨在探讨体外冲击波疗法在减轻肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者疼痛、改善功能、关节活动度、生活质量、疲劳和健康状况自我感知方面的有效性。
系统检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL、Physiotherapy Evidence Database 和 SPORTDiscus,仅纳入截至 2022 年 6 月 2 日发表的随机临床试验。主要结局变量为疼痛,采用视觉模拟评分和压力疼痛阈值以及功能进行报告。使用方差倒数法和随机效应模型进行定量分析。
共纳入 27 项研究(体外冲击波治疗组 595 名参与者)。与对照组相比,体外冲击波疗法在减轻疼痛方面的效果更为显著,表现在视觉模拟评分(MD=-1.7cm;95%置信区间=-2.2 至-1.1)和压力疼痛阈值(均值差=1.1kg/cm 2 ;95%置信区间=0.4 至 1.7)以及功能(标准化均数差=-0.8;95%置信区间=-1.6 至-0.04)方面具有高度异质性。然而,体外冲击波疗法与干针、运动、浸润和激光等其他干预措施之间并未发现差异。
与对照组和超声疗法相比,体外冲击波疗法在减轻肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者疼痛和改善功能方面更为有效。
要获得 CME 学分:请在线完成自我评估活动和评估,网址为 http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME。
要获得 CME 学分:请在线完成自我评估活动和评估,网址为 http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME。
CME 目标:完成本文后,读者应能够:(1)确定径向和聚焦体外冲击波对肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者疼痛感知、压力疼痛阈值和功能的影响;(2)描述改善肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者疼痛感知的体外冲击波治疗干预方案;(3)描述体外冲击波疗法相对于干针等其他干预措施的优势和劣势。
高级。
学术物理治疗师协会经继续医学教育认证委员会认可,可为医生提供继续医学教育。学术物理治疗师协会将本次基于期刊的 CME 活动最多指定为 1.0 个 AMA PRA 类别 1 学分(™)。医生应仅声明与其参与活动程度相符的学分。
高级。
学术物理治疗师协会经继续医学教育认证委员会认可,可为医生提供继续医学教育。学术物理治疗师协会将本次基于期刊的 CME 活动最多指定为 1.0 个 AMA PRA 类别 1 学分(™)。医生应仅声明与其参与活动程度相符的学分。