Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB#7431, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7601, NC State University Campus, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Nov 28;57(47):18744-18753. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00536. Epub 2023 May 23.
Conventional water treatment practices utilizing chemical disinfection, especially chlorination, are considered generally effective in producing microbiologically safe drinking water. However, protozoan pathogens such as oocysts of are very resistant to chlorine, which has led to consideration of alternative disinfectants for their control. Free bromine, HOBr, has not been evaluated extensively as an alternative halogen disinfectant for inactivation of in drinking water or reclaimed water for non-potable uses. Bromine is a versatile disinfectant consisting of different chemical forms with persistent microbicidal efficacy under varied water quality conditions and is effective against a range of waterborne microbes of health concern. The objectives of this study are to (1) compare the efficacy of free bromine to free chlorine at similar concentrations (as milligrams per liter) for disinfection of oocysts, spores, and MS2 coliphage in a model buffered water and (2) evaluate the kinetics of inactivation of these microorganisms using appropriate disinfection models. Overall, at a target concentration of ∼5 mg/L, bromine averaged 0.6 log (73.8%) reductions of oocyst infectivity after 300 min (CT: 1166 min·mg/L) and produced up to a 0.8 log reduction disinfectant activity. An ∼5.0 mg/L chlorine dose increased oocyst infectivity by only 0.4 log (64%) after 300 min (CT: 895 min·mg/L). spores and MS2 coliphage treated with bromine and chlorine were reduced by 4 log (99.99%) for both disinfectants over the duration of the experiments.
传统的水处理方法利用化学消毒,特别是氯化消毒,被认为可以有效地生产微生物安全的饮用水。然而,原生动物病原体,如 的卵囊,对氯具有很强的抵抗力,这导致人们考虑使用替代消毒剂来控制它们。游离溴,HOBr,尚未被广泛评估为替代卤素消毒剂,以灭活饮用水或非饮用水再利用水中的 。溴是一种多功能消毒剂,由不同的化学形式组成,在不同的水质条件下具有持久的杀菌效果,对一系列与健康有关的水传播微生物有效。本研究的目的是:(1) 比较游离溴与游离氯在类似浓度(以毫克/升计)下对模型缓冲水中的 卵囊、 孢子和 MS2 噬菌体的消毒效果;(2) 使用适当的消毒模型评估这些微生物的失活动力学。总体而言,在目标浓度约为 5mg/L 时,溴对 卵囊感染性的平均降低幅度为 0.6log(73.8%),作用 300 分钟(CT:1166min·mg/L),并产生高达 0.8log 的消毒活性降低。约 5.0mg/L 的氯剂量在 300 分钟后仅使卵囊感染性增加 0.4log(64%)(CT:895min·mg/L)。用溴和氯处理的 孢子和 MS2 噬菌体在实验过程中均降低了 4log(99.99%)。