deSouza Priyanka, Barkjohn Karoline, Clements Andrea, Lee Jenny, Kahn Ralph, Crawford Ben, Kinney Patrick
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Colorado Denver, Denver CO, 80202, USA.
CU Population Center, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder CO, 80302, USA.
Environ Sci Atmos. 2023 Feb 3;3:521-536. doi: 10.1039/d2ea00142j.
Low-cost sensors (LCS) are increasingly being used to measure fine particulate matter (PM) concentrations in cities around the world. One of the most commonly deployed LCS is the PurpleAir with ~ 15,000 sensors deployed in the United States, alone. PurpleAir measurements are widely used by the public to evaluate PM levels in their neighborhoods. PurpleAir measurements are also increasingly being integrated into models by researchers to develop large-scale estimates of PM. However, the change in sensor performance over time has not been well studied. It is important to understand the lifespan of these sensors to determine when they should be serviced or replaced, and when measurements from these devices should or should not be used for various applications. This paper fills this gap by leveraging the fact that: (1) Each PurpleAir sensor is comprised of two identical sensors and the divergence between their measurements can be observed, and (2) There are numerous PurpleAir sensors within 50 meters of regulatory monitors allowing for the comparison of measurements between these instruments. We propose empirically derived degradation outcomes for the PurpleAir sensors and evaluate how these outcomes change over time. On average, we find that the number of 'flagged' measurements, where the two sensors within each PurpleAir sensor disagree, increases with time to ~ 4% after 4 years of operation. Approximately 2 percent of all PurpleAir sensors were permanently degraded. The largest fraction of permanently degraded PurpleAir sensors appeared to be in the hot and humid climate zone, suggesting that sensors in these locations may need to be replaced more frequently. We also find that the bias of PurpleAir sensors, or the difference between corrected PM levels and the corresponding reference measurements, changed over time by -0.12 μg/m(95% CI: -0.13 μg/m, -0.10 μg/m) per year. The average bias increases dramatically after 3.5 years. Further, climate zone is a significant modifier of the association between degradation outcomes and time.
低成本传感器(LCS)越来越多地被用于测量世界各地城市中的细颗粒物(PM)浓度。最常用的LCS之一是PurpleAir,仅在美国就部署了约15000个传感器。PurpleAir的测量数据被公众广泛用于评估其社区的PM水平。研究人员也越来越多地将PurpleAir的测量数据整合到模型中,以进行PM的大规模估算。然而,传感器性能随时间的变化尚未得到充分研究。了解这些传感器的使用寿命对于确定何时应进行维护或更换,以及何时应或不应将这些设备的测量数据用于各种应用非常重要。本文通过利用以下事实填补了这一空白:(1)每个PurpleAir传感器由两个相同的传感器组成,可以观察到它们测量值之间的差异;(2)在距离监管监测器50米范围内有许多PurpleAir传感器,便于比较这些仪器之间的测量数据。我们提出了基于经验得出的PurpleAir传感器退化结果,并评估这些结果如何随时间变化。平均而言,我们发现每个PurpleAir传感器内两个传感器测量值不一致的“标记”测量数量随时间增加,运行4年后增加到约4%。所有PurpleAir传感器中约2%永久退化。永久退化的PurpleAir传感器中最大比例似乎出现在炎热潮湿的气候区,这表明这些地区的传感器可能需要更频繁地更换。我们还发现,PurpleAir传感器的偏差,即校正后的PM水平与相应参考测量值之间的差异,每年变化-0.12μg/m(95%置信区间:-0.13μg/m,-0.10μg/m)。3.5年后平均偏差急剧增加。此外,气候区是退化结果与时间之间关联关系的一个重要调节因素。