Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286047. eCollection 2023.
Prehospital advanced life support (ALS) has been offered in many countries for patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA); however, its effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the impact of emergency medical service (EMS) with ALS training as a nationwide pilot project for adults with OHCA in the Republic of Korea. This retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted between July 2019 and December 2020 using the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium registry. The patients were categorized into an intervention group that received EMS with ALS training and a control group that did not receive EMS with ALS training. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed using matched data to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the intervention group had a lower rate of supraglottic airway usage (60.5% vs. 75.6%) and a higher rate of undergoing endotracheal intubation (21.7% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.001). In addition, the intervention group was administered more intravenous epinephrine (59.8% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.001) and used mechanical chest compression devices more frequently in prehospital settings than the control group (59.0% vs. 23.8%, P < 0.001). Based on the results of multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis, survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.87) of the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group; however, good neurological outcome was not significantly different between the two groups. In this study, survival to hospital discharge was worse in patients with OHCA who received EMS with ALS training than in those who did not.
在许多国家,对于发生院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的患者,都提供了院前高级生命支持(ALS);然而,其效果仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定作为韩国 OHCA 成人的全国性试点项目,具有 ALS 培训的急救医疗服务(EMS)的影响。这是一项回顾性多中心观察性研究,于 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月期间使用韩国心脏骤停研究联盟登记处进行。将患者分为接受具有 ALS 培训的 EMS 的干预组和未接受具有 ALS 培训的 EMS 的对照组。使用匹配数据进行条件逻辑回归分析,以比较两组之间的临床结果。与对照组相比,干预组使用经口气道(60.5%对 75.6%)和进行气管插管(21.7%对 6.1%,P<0.001)的比例较低。此外,干预组在院前环境中接受更多的静脉内肾上腺素(59.8%对 14.2%,P<0.001)和更频繁地使用机械胸部按压设备(59.0%对 23.8%,P<0.001)的比例较高。基于多变量条件逻辑回归分析的结果,干预组患者的存活至出院(优势比:0.48,95%置信区间:0.27-0.87)显著低于对照组;然而,两组之间的良好神经结局无显著差异。在这项研究中,接受 ALS 培训的 EMS 治疗的 OHCA 患者的出院存活率较差。