Suppr超能文献

通过傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)和热脱附气相色谱-质谱联用(TED-GC-MS)检测四种不同类型城市污水处理厂中的微塑料痕迹。

Detection of microplastic traces in four different types of municipal wastewater treatment plants through FT-IR and TED-GC-MS.

机构信息

Water Supply and Sewerage Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon, 22689, Republic of Korea.

Analysis Technical Center, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering & Technology, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, 14502, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2023 Sep 15;333:122017. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122017. Epub 2023 Jun 10.

Abstract

Large amounts of microplastics are discharged into wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), from where some of them are released into natural waterbodies on account of their not being fully eliminated by WWTPs. To investigate the behavior and emission of microplastics from WWTPs, we selected four WWTPs with different treatment technologies, including anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic (AO), sequence batch reactor (SBR), media, and membrane bioreactor (MBR). The number of microplastics detected using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy ranged from 520 to 1820 particles/L in influent and from 0.56 to 2.34 particles/L in effluent. The microplastic removal efficiencies of four WWTPs were over 99%, indicating that the type of treatment technologies did not significantly affect the removal rate of microplastics. In the unit process for each WWTP, the major stages relating to microplastic removal were the secondary clarifier and tertiary treatment processes. Most microplastics detected were categorized as fragments and fibers, while other types were hardly detected. The size of more than 80% of microplastic particles detected in WWTPs ranged between 20 and 300 μm, indicating that they were significantly smaller than the size threshold defined for microplastics. Therefore, we used thermal extraction-desorption coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (TED-GC-MS) to evaluate the microplastic mass content in all four WWTPs, and the results were compared with those of the FT-IR analysis. In this method, only four components, namely polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, and polyethylene terephthalate, were analyzed because of the analysis limitation, and the total microplastic concentration represented the sum of four components concentrations. The influent and effluent microplastic concentrations estimated by TED-GC-MS ranged from not detectable to 160 μg/L and 0.04-1.07 μg/L, respectively, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.861 (p < 0.05) between the TED-GC-MS and FT-IR results, when compared to the combined abundance of the four microplastic components by FT-IR analysis.

摘要

大量的微塑料被排放到污水处理厂(WWTP)中,由于 WWTP 无法完全去除它们,其中一些微塑料会释放到自然水体中。为了研究 WWTP 中微塑料的行为和排放,我们选择了四种具有不同处理技术的 WWTP,包括厌氧-缺氧-好氧(AO)、序批式反应器(SBR)、介质和膜生物反应器(MBR)。傅里叶变换红外(FT-IR)光谱检测到的微塑料数量在进水口为 520 至 1820 个/升,在出水口为 0.56 至 2.34 个/升。四个 WWTP 的微塑料去除效率均超过 99%,表明处理技术的类型对微塑料的去除率没有显著影响。在每个 WWTP 的单元工艺中,与微塑料去除相关的主要阶段是二沉池和三级处理过程。检测到的大多数微塑料被归类为碎片和纤维,而其他类型则很少检测到。在 WWTP 中检测到的微塑料颗粒中,超过 80%的尺寸大于 20 至 300μm,表明它们明显小于微塑料定义的尺寸阈值。因此,我们使用热提取-解吸与气相色谱-质谱联用(TED-GC-MS)评估了四个 WWTP 中的微塑料质量含量,并将结果与 FT-IR 分析进行了比较。在这种方法中,由于分析限制,仅分析了四种成分,即聚乙烯、聚丙烯、聚苯乙烯和聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯,而总微塑料浓度代表了这四种成分浓度的总和。TED-GC-MS 估计的进水和出水微塑料浓度范围分别为不可检测到 160μg/L 和 0.04-1.07μg/L,与 FT-IR 分析的四种微塑料成分的总丰度相比,TED-GC-MS 和 FT-IR 结果的相关系数为 0.861(p<0.05)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验