Mtenga Sally, Mhalu Grace, Osetinsky Brianna, Ramaiya Kaushik, Kassim Tani, Hooley Brady, Tediosi Fabrizio
Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Allschwil, Switzerland.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 14;3(6):e0002010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002010. eCollection 2023.
Vaccines have played a critical role in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic globally, and Tanzania has made significant efforts to make them available to the public in addition to sensitizing them on its benefit. However, vaccine hesitancy remains a concern. It may prevent optimal uptake of this promising tool in many communities. This study aims to explore opinions and perceptions on vaccine hesitancy to better understand local attitudes towards vaccine hesitancy in both rural and urban Tanzania. The study employed cross-sectional semi-structured interviews with 42 participants. The data were collected in October 2021. Men and women aged between 18 and 70 years were purposefully sampled from Dar es Salaam and Tabora regions. Thematic content analysis was used to categorize data inductively and deductively. We found that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy exists and is shaped by multiple socio-political and vaccine related factors. Vaccine related factors included worries over vaccine safety (e.g., death, infertility, and zombie), limited knowledge about the vaccines and fear of the vaccine's impact on pre-existing conditions. Participants also found it paradoxical that mask and hygiene mandates are expected even after vaccination, which further exacerbated their doubts about vaccine efficacy and their hesitancy. Participants possessed a range of questions regarding COVID-19 vaccines that they wanted answered by the government. Social factors included preference for traditional and home remedies and influence from others. Political factors included inconsistent messages on COVID-19 from the community and political leaders; and doubts about the existence of COVID-19 and the vaccine. Our findings suggest that the COVID-19 vaccine is beyond a medical intervention, it carries with it a variety of expectations and myths that need to be addressed in order to build trust and acceptance within communities. Health promotion messages need to respond to heterogeneous questions, misinformation, doubts, and concerns over safety issues. An understanding of country-specific perspectives toward COVID-19 vaccines can greatly inform the development of localized strategies for meaningful uptake in Tanzania.
疫苗在全球应对新冠疫情中发挥了关键作用,坦桑尼亚除了向公众宣传疫苗的益处外,还做出了巨大努力,使疫苗可供公众使用。然而,疫苗犹豫仍然是一个令人担忧的问题。这可能会阻碍这一有前景的工具在许多社区的最佳推广。本研究旨在探讨对疫苗犹豫的看法和认知,以更好地了解坦桑尼亚农村和城市地区对疫苗犹豫的当地态度。该研究采用了对42名参与者进行横断面半结构化访谈的方法。数据于2021年10月收集。从达累斯萨拉姆和塔博拉地区有目的地抽取了年龄在18岁至70岁之间的男性和女性。采用主题内容分析法对数据进行归纳和演绎分类。我们发现,新冠疫苗犹豫现象存在,并且受到多种社会政治和与疫苗相关的因素影响。与疫苗相关的因素包括对疫苗安全性的担忧(如死亡、不孕和变成僵尸)、对疫苗的了解有限以及对疫苗对现有疾病影响的恐惧。参与者还发现,即使接种疫苗后仍要求佩戴口罩和保持卫生,这很矛盾,这进一步加剧了他们对疫苗效力的怀疑和犹豫。参与者对新冠疫苗有一系列问题,希望政府给出答案。社会因素包括对传统和家庭疗法的偏好以及他人的影响。政治因素包括社区和政治领导人关于新冠疫情的信息不一致;以及对新冠疫情和疫苗存在的怀疑。我们的研究结果表明,新冠疫苗不仅仅是一种医疗干预措施,它还伴随着各种期望和误解,为了在社区内建立信任和接受度,需要解决这些问题。健康促进信息需要回应各种不同的问题、错误信息、怀疑以及对安全问题的担忧。了解坦桑尼亚对新冠疫苗的特定国家观点,可为制定在坦桑尼亚有效推广疫苗的本地化策略提供极大的参考。