Salvagno Gian Luca, Gianfilippi Gianluca, Pighi Laura, De Nitto Simone, Henry Brandon M, Lippi Giuseppe
Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Service of Laboratory Medicine, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Adv Lab Med. 2021 May 24;2(3):409-416. doi: 10.1515/almed-2021-0041. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Since commercial SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) antigen rapid detection tests (Ag-RDTs) display broad diagnostic efficiency, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of Fluorecare SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Test Kit in a real-life scenario.
The study population consisted of a series of patients undergoing SARS-Cov-2 diagnostic testing at Pederzoli Hospital of Peschiera del Garda (Verona, Italy). A nasopharyngeal swab was collected upon hospital admission and assayed with molecular (Altona Diagnostics RealStar SARSCoV-2 RT-PCR Kit) and antigen (Fluorecare SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Test Kit) tests.
The study population consisted of 354 patients (mean age, 47 ± 20 years; 195 women, 55.1%), 223 (65.8%) positive at molecular testing. A significant correlation was found between Fluorecare SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Test Kit and Altona (both and genes: r=-0.75; p<0.001). The cumulative area under the curve in all nasopharyngeal samples was 0.68. At ≥1.0 S/CO manufacturer's cut-off, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were 27.5, 99.2, 41.5 and 98.5%, respectively. Considerable improvement of sensitivity was observed as Ct values decreased, becoming 66.7% in samples with mean Ct values <30, 90.5% in those with mean Ct values <25, up to 100% in those with mean Ct values <20.
The modest sensitivity and negative predictive value of Fluorecare SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Test Kit makes unadvisable to use this assay as surrogate of molecular testing for definitively diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection, though its suitable sensitivity at high viral load could make it a reliable screening test for patients with higher infective potential.
鉴于商用严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原快速检测试验(Ag-RDTs)显示出广泛的诊断效率,本研究旨在评估Fluorecare SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白检测试剂盒在实际临床中的性能。
研究对象为在意大利维罗纳加尔达湖畔佩斯基耶拉的佩德佐利医院接受SARS-CoV-2诊断检测的一系列患者。入院时采集鼻咽拭子,并采用分子检测(Altona诊断公司RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR试剂盒)和抗原检测(Fluorecare SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白检测试剂盒)进行检测。
研究对象包括354例患者(平均年龄47±20岁;195例女性,占55.1%),其中223例(65.8%)分子检测呈阳性。Fluorecare SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白检测试剂盒与Altona检测(针对N和ORF1ab基因)之间存在显著相关性(r=-0.75;p<0.001)。所有鼻咽样本的曲线下面积为0.68。在制造商设定的≥1.0 S/CO临界值时,灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为27.5%、99.2%、41.5%和98.5%。随着Ct值降低,灵敏度有显著提高,平均Ct值<30的样本中灵敏度为66.7%,平均Ct值<25的样本中为90.5%,平均Ct值<20的样本中高达100%。
Fluorecare SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白检测试剂盒的灵敏度和阴性预测值一般,不宜将其作为确诊SARS-CoV-2感染的分子检测替代方法,不过其在高病毒载量时具有合适的灵敏度,可能使其成为对具有较高感染潜力患者的可靠筛查检测方法。