Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cytometry A. 2023 Oct;103(10):777-785. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.24777. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
An increasing number of translational investigations of lung biology rely on analyzing single cell suspensions obtained from human lungs. To obtain these single cell suspensions, human lungs from biopsies or research-consented organ donors must be subjected to mechanical and enzymatic digestion prior to analysis with either flow cytometry or single cell RNA sequencing. A variety of enzymes have been used to perform tissue digestion, each with potential limitations. To better understand the limitations of each enzymatic digestion protocol and to establish a framework for comparing studies across protocols, we performed five commonly published protocols in parallel from identical samples obtained from 6 human lungs. Following mechanical (gentleMACS™) and enzymatic digestion, we quantified cell count and viability using a Nexcelom Cellometer and determined cell phenotype using multiparameter spectral flow cytometry (Cytek™ Aurora). We found that all protocols were superior in cellular yield and viability when compared to mechanical digestion alone. Protocols high in dispase cleaved immune markers CD4, CD8, CD69, and CD103 and contributed to an increased monocyte to macrophage yield. Similarly, dispase led to a differential epithelial cell yield, with increased TSPN8 and ITGA6 epithelial cells and reduced CD66e cells. When compared to collagenase D, collagenase P protocols yielded increased AT1 and AT2 cells and decreased endothelial cells. These results provide a framework for selecting an enzymatic digestion protocol best suited to the scientific question and allow for comparison of studies using different protocols.
越来越多的肺部生物学转化研究依赖于分析从人肺中获得的单细胞悬浮液。为了获得这些单细胞悬浮液,必须对活检或经研究同意的器官供体的人肺进行机械和酶消化,然后再用流式细胞术或单细胞 RNA 测序进行分析。已经使用了多种酶来进行组织消化,每种酶都有潜在的局限性。为了更好地了解每种酶消化方案的局限性,并为跨方案研究建立比较框架,我们从 6 个人肺中获得的相同样本中同时平行进行了五个常用的已发表方案。在进行机械(gentleMACS™)和酶消化后,我们使用 Nexcelom Cellometer 定量细胞计数和活力,并使用多参数光谱流式细胞术(Cytek™Aurora)确定细胞表型。我们发现,与单独进行机械消化相比,所有方案在细胞产量和活力方面都有优势。含有较高量Dispase 的方案可切割免疫标志物 CD4、CD8、CD69 和 CD103,并有助于增加单核细胞向巨噬细胞的产量。同样,Dispase 导致上皮细胞产量出现差异,TSPN8 和 ITGA6 上皮细胞增加,CD66e 细胞减少。与胶原酶 D 相比,胶原酶 P 方案可增加 AT1 和 AT2 细胞,减少内皮细胞。这些结果为选择最适合科学问题的酶消化方案提供了框架,并允许使用不同方案的研究进行比较。