Division of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 1;30(7):6316-6329. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070466.
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) represents the cornerstone of surgical management for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and involves peritonectomy procedures aimed at complete peritoneal tumour resection. Frequently, CRS is combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The combination of CRS + HIPEC is now considered the standard of care in patients with colorectal and ovarian PC. However, the role of this multi-modality treatment approach in patients with PC of neuroendocrine tumour origin (NET-PC) is less well understood. This systematic review provides a summary of available evidence on management strategies for patients with NET-PC. A systematic literature search was performed using Ovid Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies reporting outcomes for patients with NET-PC undergoing surgical treatment. Eligible studies were assessed for methodological quality and design and evaluated for a method of surgical treatment, method of HIPEC delivery, oncological outcomes, and treatment-related morbidity. Eight studies, including a total of 1240 patients with NET-PC, met predefined inclusion criteria and have been included in this review. In three of the included studies, CRS alone was performed for patients with NET-PC, while five studies reported outcomes with combined treatment using CRS plus HIPEC. All studies were performed at tertiary peritoneal malignancy centres. Only one study directly compared outcomes in patients with NET-PC undergoing CRS plus HIPEC compared with CRS in isolation, with no significant difference in overall survival reported. Carefully selected patients with NET-PC may benefit from aggressive surgical treatment in the form of CRS +/- HIPEC. These procedures are best undertaken at centres with expertise in the management of both neuroendocrine tumours and peritoneal malignancy, as both are conditions that require tertiary-level care. The additional benefit of the HIPEC component in this group of patients remains unclear and warrants further investigation in clinical trials. Overall, the quality of data on this subject is restricted by the low number of studies and the variability in treatment methods employed. A multi-national data registry for patients with NET-PC may offer the opportunity to better define treatment algorithms. Translational research efforts in parallel should focus on developing a better biological understanding of NET-PC, with a view to identifying more effective intraperitoneal cytocidal agents.
细胞减灭术(CRS)是腹膜癌(PC)外科治疗的基石,涉及旨在完全切除腹膜肿瘤的腹膜切除术。经常,CRS 与腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)联合使用。CRS+HIPEC 的联合应用现在被认为是结直肠和卵巢 PC 患者的标准治疗方法。然而,这种多模式治疗方法在神经内分泌肿瘤起源的 PC(NET-PC)患者中的作用还不太清楚。本系统综述提供了关于 NET-PC 患者管理策略的现有证据总结。使用 Ovid Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 数据库进行系统文献检索,以确定报告接受手术治疗的 NET-PC 患者结局的研究。评估合格研究的方法学质量和设计,并评估手术治疗方法、HIPEC 输送方法、肿瘤学结局和治疗相关发病率。八项研究,包括总共 1240 名 NET-PC 患者,符合预先确定的纳入标准,并已纳入本综述。在纳入的三项研究中,单独为 NET-PC 患者进行 CRS,而五项研究报告了联合使用 CRS+HIPEC 的治疗结果。所有研究均在三级腹膜恶性肿瘤中心进行。只有一项研究直接比较了接受 CRS+HIPEC 与单独 CRS 的 NET-PC 患者的结局,报告的总生存率无显著差异。经过精心选择的 NET-PC 患者可能受益于 CRS +/-HIPEC 的积极手术治疗。这些手术最好在具有神经内分泌肿瘤和腹膜恶性肿瘤管理专业知识的中心进行,因为这两种疾病都需要三级护理。在这组患者中,HIPEC 成分的额外益处仍不清楚,需要在临床试验中进一步研究。总体而言,由于研究数量较少以及所采用的治疗方法存在差异,因此关于该主题的数据质量受到限制。NET-PC 患者的多国数据登记可能提供更好地定义治疗算法的机会。平行的转化研究工作应侧重于对 NET-PC 进行更好的生物学理解,以期确定更有效的腹腔细胞杀伤剂。