Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Blood Rev. 2023 Nov;62:101128. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101128. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes.
骨髓增生异常综合征/肿瘤(MDS)的分类、预后和反应评估指南最近都已更新。在这份代表 MDS 国际协作组(icMDS)的报告中,我们总结了这些进展。我们首先批判性地检查了更新的世界卫生组织(WHO)分类和 MDS 的国际共识分类(ICC)。然后,我们比较了传统的和基于分子的 MDS 风险评估工具。最后,我们讨论了标准在衡量治疗益处方面的局限性,并强调了国际工作组(IWG)2018 年和 2023 年反应标准如何解决这些不足,并得到了 icMDS 的认可。我们还通过讨论生活质量评估的价值,探讨了以患者为中心的护理的重要性。我们希望这篇综述的读者能更好地理解如何对 MDS 进行分类、预测临床结果和评估治疗结果。