Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan.
Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0291661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291661. eCollection 2023.
Education has an impact on health, but the magnitude of the impact may vary across countries. This cross-sectional study compared educational inequalities in health and their mediators in late adulthood between China and Japan, which both face rapid population aging. We studied the same age cohort (63-72 years) based on two nationwide population-based surveys in 2018: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (N = 5,277) and Japan's Longitudinal Survey of Middle-Age and Elderly Persons (N = 20,001). The relative index of inequality (RII) in education was used to measure educational inequality in self-rated health (SRH). We then examined the extent to which income, smoking, leisure-time physical activity, and social participation mediated educational inequalities in SRH. In both countries, a lower educational level was associated with a higher risk of poor SRH; in China, however, the gradient was flatter. In China, the RII of education was 1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-2.39) for men and 1.47 (95% CI: 1.06-2.05) for women. In Japan, meanwhile, RII was 2.70 (95% CI: 2.21-3.28) for men and 2.60 (95% CI: 2.13-3.18) for women. Our mediation analysis based on logistic regression models with bootstrapping also found that social participation was a key mediator of educational inequalities in health in both countries. In all, the results underscore that one's relative position in educational inequalities is a reliable predictor of subjective health in late adulthood in both China and Japan.
教育对健康有影响,但影响的程度可能因国家而异。本横断面研究比较了中国和日本在人口老龄化迅速发展的情况下,成年人后期健康方面的教育不平等及其中介因素。我们基于 2018 年两项全国性人口普查研究了相同的年龄队列(63-72 岁):中国健康与退休纵向研究(n=5277)和日本中老年纵向研究(n=20001)。相对指数差异(RII)用于衡量自我报告健康(SRH)方面的教育不平等。然后,我们研究了收入、吸烟、休闲时间体力活动和社会参与在多大程度上调节了 SRH 方面的教育不平等。在这两个国家,教育程度较低与较差的 SRH 风险较高相关;然而,在中国,这种梯度较为平坦。在中国,男性的教育 RII 为 1.69(95%置信区间[CI]:1.20-2.39),女性为 1.47(95%CI:1.06-2.05)。相比之下,在日本,男性的 RII 为 2.70(95%CI:2.21-3.28),女性为 2.60(95%CI:2.13-3.18)。我们基于逻辑回归模型和自举的中介分析也发现,社会参与是两国健康方面教育不平等的一个关键中介因素。总之,研究结果强调,一个人在教育不平等中的相对地位是预测中国和日本成年人后期主观健康的可靠指标。