Suppr超能文献

一项关于围产期死亡审查项目中使用的标准化工具的系统评价方案。

A protocol for a systematic review of standardised tools used in perinatal death review programmes.

作者信息

O'Connor Emily, Greene Richard, O'Donoghue Keelin, Leitao Sara

机构信息

INFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2023 Aug 24;5:52. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13574.2. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Perinatal mortality encompasses stillbirths and early neonatal deaths. A perinatal death surveillance and response cycle has been recommended by the World Health Organization for use in the review of perinatal deaths. The main components of the cycle include identifying and reporting perinatal deaths, and reviewing the deaths, including potentially modifiable factors, in order to measure and improve quality of care provided to women and infants. There is no consensus on the best way to design, implement and conduct perinatal death reviews. This systematic review aims to identify standardised tools that are used to review perinatal deaths.  The primary aim of this protocol is to describe methodology for a systematic search of the literature to identify standardised tools that are used to review perinatal deaths in upper-middle to high-income countries. Review tools may include standardised checklists, forms, frameworks or other structured documents used to review perinatal deaths. Review tools will be appraised to see if they incorporate the identification of modifiable factors in perinatal deaths and establish recommendations for improvements to quality of care provided. A systematic review of the literature will be performed to identify peer-reviewed publications and grey literature describing the use of perinatal mortality review tools without date restrictions. The eligibility of review tools for inclusion will be based on inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to the SPIDER framework. Data will be extracted based on the structure and content of included review tools, and the tools will be appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation Health Systems (AGREE-HS) instrument. : This systematic review protocol for identifying and appraising standardised perinatal mortality review tools may help to establish the optimal way to structure a standardised review process for perinatal mortality in middle- to high-income countries. : CRD42022326877.

摘要

围产期死亡率包括死产和早期新生儿死亡。世界卫生组织推荐了一个围产期死亡监测与应对周期,用于围产期死亡的审查。该周期的主要组成部分包括识别和报告围产期死亡情况,并对死亡情况进行审查,包括潜在的可改变因素,以便衡量和改善为妇女和婴儿提供的护理质量。关于设计、实施和开展围产期死亡审查的最佳方法,目前尚无共识。本系统评价旨在识别用于审查围产期死亡的标准化工具。本方案的主要目的是描述一种系统检索文献的方法,以识别用于中高收入国家围产期死亡审查的标准化工具。审查工具可能包括用于审查围产期死亡的标准化清单、表格、框架或其他结构化文件。将对审查工具进行评估,以查看它们是否纳入了围产期死亡中可改变因素的识别,并为改善所提供护理质量提出建议。将对文献进行系统评价,以识别描述围产期死亡率审查工具使用情况的同行评审出版物和灰色文献,无日期限制。审查工具纳入的资格将基于适用于SPIDER框架的纳入和排除标准。将根据纳入的审查工具的结构和内容提取数据,并使用卫生系统指南研究与评价评估工具(AGREE-HS)对工具进行评估。:本用于识别和评估标准化围产期死亡率审查工具的系统评价方案可能有助于确定在中高收入国家构建围产期死亡率标准化审查流程的最佳方式。:CRD42022326877。

相似文献

1
A protocol for a systematic review of standardised tools used in perinatal death review programmes.
HRB Open Res. 2023 Aug 24;5:52. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13574.2. eCollection 2022.
2
A systematic review of standardised tools used in perinatal death review programmes.
Women Birth. 2024 Feb;37(1):88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 25;3(3):CD012982. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012982.pub2.
6
Burden, causes, and risk factors of perinatal mortality in Eastern Africa: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gates Open Res. 2024 May 8;6:123. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13915.2. eCollection 2022.
7
Antenatal interventions for preventing stillbirth, fetal loss and perinatal death: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 18;12(12):CD009599. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009599.pub2.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Global, regional, and national estimates and trends in stillbirths from 2000 to 2019: a systematic assessment.
Lancet. 2021 Aug 28;398(10302):772-785. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01112-0.
3
Clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage in high-income countries: a systematic review.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Jun;42(6):1146-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
4
Decreasing trend in preterm birth and perinatal mortality, do disparities also decline?
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 26;20(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08925-w.
5
Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 25;3(3):CD012982. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012982.pub2.
6
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
10
Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43. doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验