Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and Department of Medicine and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jan 23;190(2):184-190. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad393.
Systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) are evaluated primarily in placebo-controlled trials with binary efficacy outcomes. In a living systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we previously analysed continuous efficacy measures.
To compare binary efficacy outcomes of systemic treatments for AD.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information (LILACS) database, Global Resource for Eczema Trials (GREAT) database and trial registries up to 1 March 2023. We included randomized trials examining ≥ 8 weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate-to-severe AD. We screened titles, abstracts and full texts and abstracted data independently, in duplicate. Outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving at least 50%, 75% and 90% improvements in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 50, EASI 75 and EASI 90, respectively) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) success. We performed random-effects Bayesian NMAs to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) between each intervention for each outcome.
Eighty-three trials with 22 122 participants were included in the systematic review. In analyses limited to trials of 8-16 weeks' duration with predominantly adult populations, abrocitinib 200 mg daily (OR 1.5, 95% CrI 1.1-2.2) and upadacitinib 15 mg daily (OR 1.7, 95% CrI 0.9-3.3) and 30 mg daily (OR 2.5, 95% CrI 1.3-5.0) were associated with higher odds of achieving EASI 50 vs. dupilumab. Abrocitinib 100 mg daily (OR 0.7, 95% CrI 0.5-1.0), baricitinib 2 mg daily (OR 0.4, 95% CrI 0.3-0.5) and 4 mg daily (OR 0.5, 95% CrI 0.3-0.7), and tralokinumab (OR 0.4, 95% CrI 0.3-0.6) were associated with lower odds of achieving EASI 50 vs. dupilumab. Results were similar for EASI 75, EASI 90 and IGA success.
Supporting results for continuous outcome measures, upadacitinib 30 mg daily and abrocitinib 200 mg daily are the most efficacious with regard to binary efficacy endpoints up to 16 weeks in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg daily, dupilumab and abrocitinib 100 mg daily. Dupilumab and both doses of upadacitinib and abrocitinib are more efficacious than baricitinib 4 and 2 mg daily and tralokinumab.
特应性皮炎(AD)的系统性治疗主要在安慰剂对照试验中评估,采用二元疗效结局。在一项活体系统评价和网络荟萃分析(NMA)中,我们之前分析了连续疗效指标。
比较 AD 系统性治疗的二元疗效结局。
我们检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学信息(LILACS)数据库、全球湿疹试验资源(GREAT)数据库和试验注册处,检索截至 2023 年 3 月 1 日的资料。我们纳入了评估中重度 AD 患者接受 8 周以上系统免疫调节药物治疗的随机试验。我们独立地对标题、摘要和全文进行筛选,并进行重复数据提取。结局指标包括患者实现 Eczema Area and Severity Index(EASI 50、EASI 75 和 EASI 90)和研究者全球评估(IGA)成功的比例,EASI 50、EASI 75 和 EASI 90 分别代表改善至少 50%、75%和 90%。我们采用随机效应贝叶斯 NMA 计算每个结局中每种干预措施的优势比(OR)和 95%可信区间(CrI)。
共纳入 83 项试验、22122 名参与者进行系统评价。在分析仅限于 8-16 周疗程、主要为成年人群的试验时,阿布昔替尼 200mg 每日(OR 1.5,95%CrI 1.1-2.2)和乌帕鲁替纳 15mg 每日(OR 1.7,95%CrI 0.9-3.3)和 30mg 每日(OR 2.5,95%CrI 1.3-5.0)与实现 EASI 50 的几率更高相关。阿布昔替尼 100mg 每日(OR 0.7,95%CrI 0.5-1.0)、巴瑞替尼 2mg 每日(OR 0.4,95%CrI 0.3-0.5)和 4mg 每日(OR 0.5,95%CrI 0.3-0.7)以及特利鲁单抗(OR 0.4,95%CrI 0.3-0.6)与实现 EASI 50 的几率更低相关。EASI 75、EASI 90 和 IGA 成功的结果相似。
与连续结局指标的支持结果一致,乌帕鲁替纳 30mg 每日和阿布昔替尼 200mg 每日在中重度 AD 成人患者中至 16 周时的二元疗效终点最有效,其次是乌帕鲁替纳 15mg 每日、度普利尤单抗和阿布昔替尼 100mg 每日。度普利尤单抗和乌帕鲁替纳的两种剂量以及阿布昔替尼比巴瑞替尼 4mg 和 2mg 每日以及特利鲁单抗更有效。