Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, 207 Uehara, Nishihara, Okinawa, 903-0215, Okinawa, Japan.
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11495-w.
Little is known on how denosumab reduces skeletal-related events (SREs) by bone metastases from solid tumors. We sought to evaluate the effect of denosumab administration in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.
Data of patients treated with denosumab were collected from electronic medical charts (n = 496). Eligible participants in this study were adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with metastatic bone lesions from solid tumors treated with denosumab. SREs, surgical interventions, the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) for spinal region, and Mirels' score for the appendicular region were evaluated. To assess whether denosumab could prevent SREs and associated surgery, the SINS and Mirels' score were compared between patients with and without SREs.
A total of 247 patients (median age, 65.5 years old; median follow-up period, 13 months) treated with denosumab for metastatic bone lesions from solid tumors were enrolled in this study. SREs occurred in 19 patients (7.7%). SREs occurred in 2 patients (0.8%) who took denosumab administration before SREs. Surgical interventions were undertaken in 14 patients (5.7%) (spinal and intradural lesions in five patients and appendicular lesions in nine patients). The mean SINS of patients without SREs compared to those with SREs were 7.5 points and 10.2 points, respectively. The mean Mirels' scores of non-SREs patients and those with SREs were 8.07 points and 10.7 points, respectively. Patients with SREs had significantly higher Mirels' score than non-SREs patients (p < 0.01). Patients with SREs had higher SINS than non-SREs patients (p = 0.09).
SREs occurred in patients with higher SINS or Mirels' scores. Two patients suffered from SREs though they took denosumab administration before SREs. Appropriate management of denosumab for patients with bone metastasis is significant. Surgical interventions may be needed for patients who with higher SINS or Mirel's scores.
关于地舒单抗如何通过抑制肿瘤骨转移来减少骨骼相关事件(SREs)知之甚少。我们旨在评估地舒单抗治疗肿瘤骨转移患者的疗效。
我们从电子病历中收集了接受地舒单抗治疗的患者的数据(n=496)。本研究纳入的患者为接受地舒单抗治疗的伴有骨转移的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)。我们评估了 SREs、手术干预、脊柱区域的脊柱不稳定肿瘤评分(SINS)和四肢区域的 Mirels 评分。为了评估地舒单抗是否能预防 SREs 和相关手术,我们比较了有 SREs 和无 SREs 患者的 SINS 和 Mirels 评分。
共有 247 例(中位年龄 65.5 岁;中位随访时间 13 个月)接受地舒单抗治疗伴有实体瘤骨转移的患者纳入本研究。19 例(7.7%)患者发生了 SREs。在发生 SREs 的 2 例患者中,他们在发生 SREs 之前接受了地舒单抗治疗(2 例患者均为脊柱和硬膜内病变,9 例患者为四肢病变)。14 例(5.7%)患者接受了手术干预。无 SREs 患者的平均 SINS 与有 SREs 患者的 SINS 分别为 7.5 分和 10.2 分。非 SREs 患者的平均 Mirels 评分与 SREs 患者的 Mirels 评分分别为 8.07 分和 10.7 分。有 SREs 的患者的 Mirels 评分明显高于无 SREs 的患者(p<0.01)。有 SREs 的患者的 SINS 评分也高于无 SREs 的患者(p=0.09)。
SREs 发生于 SINS 或 Mirels 评分较高的患者中。尽管这 2 例患者在发生 SREs 之前接受了地舒单抗治疗,但仍发生了 SREs。因此,对伴有骨转移的患者,适当管理地舒单抗治疗非常重要。对于 SINS 或 Mirels 评分较高的患者,可能需要手术干预。