Fantin Romain, Agarwala Neha, Aparicio Amada, Pfeiffer Ruth, Waterboer Tim, Abdelnour Arturo, Butt Julia, Flock Julia, Remans Kim, Prevots D Rebecca, Porras Carolina, Hildesheim Allan, Loria Viviana, Gail Mitchell H, Herrero Rolando
Agencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica.
Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Oct 17;27:100616. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100616. eCollection 2023 Nov.
The true incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Costa Rica was likely much higher than officially reported, because infection is often associated with mild symptoms and testing was limited by official guidelines and socio-economic factors.
Using serology to define natural infection, we developed a statistical model to estimate the true cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Costa Rica early in the pandemic. We estimated seroprevalence from 2223 blood samples collected from November 2020 to October 2021 from 1976 population-based controls from the RESPIRA study. Samples were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and the receptor-binding-domain of the spike proteins. Using a generalized linear model, we estimated the ratio of true infections to officially reported cases. Applying these ratios to officially reported totals by age, sex, and geographic area, we estimated the true number of infections in the study area, where 70% of Costa Ricans reside. We adjusted the seroprevalence estimates for antibody decay over time, estimated from 1562 blood samples from 996 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases.
The estimated total proportion infected () was 4.0 times higher than the officially reported total proportion infected (). By December 16th, 2021, the was 47% [42-52] while the was 12%. In children and adolescents, the was 11.0 times higher than the .
Our findings suggest that nearly half the population had been infected by the end of 2021. By the end of 2022, it is likely that a large majority of the population had been infected.
This work was sponsored and funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases through the National Cancer Institute, the Science, Innovation, Technology and Telecommunications Ministry of Costa Rica, and Costa Rican Biomedical Research Agency-Fundacion INCIENSA (grant N/A).
在哥斯达黎加,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的实际发病率可能远高于官方报告的数字,因为感染往往与轻微症状相关,且检测受到官方指南和社会经济因素的限制。
我们利用血清学来定义自然感染情况,开发了一个统计模型,以估算疫情早期哥斯达黎加SARS-CoV-2的实际累计发病率。我们从2020年11月至2021年10月从RESPIRA研究中1976名基于人群的对照者收集的2223份血样中估算血清阳性率。对血样进行了针对SARS-CoV-2核衣壳和刺突蛋白受体结合域的抗体检测。我们使用广义线性模型估算实际感染数与官方报告病例数的比例。将这些比例应用于按年龄、性别和地理区域划分的官方报告总数,我们估算了研究区域(居住着70%哥斯达黎加人的地区)的实际感染数。我们根据996例经聚合酶链反应(PCR)确诊的新冠病例的1562份血样估算的抗体随时间的衰减情况,对血清阳性率估算值进行了调整。
估算的总感染比例()比官方报告的总感染比例()高4.0倍。到2021年12月16日,前者为47%[42 - 52],而后者为12%。在儿童和青少年中,前者比后者高11.0倍。
我们的研究结果表明,到2021年底,近一半的人口已被感染。到2022年底,很可能绝大多数人口已被感染。
这项工作由美国国立过敏与传染病研究所通过国立癌症研究所、哥斯达黎加科学、创新、技术和电信部以及哥斯达黎加生物医学研究机构 - 因西恩萨基金会(资助编号:无)赞助和资助。