Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 大流行前后,纽约州医疗补助计划慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物过量的风险。

Risks of opioid overdose among New York State Medicaid recipients with chronic pain before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA.

Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2023 Dec;177:107789. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107789. Epub 2023 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to healthcare disruptions for patients with chronic pain. Following initial disruptions, national policies were enacted to expand access to long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services, which may have modified risk of opioid overdose. We examined associations between LTOT and/or OUD with fatal and non-fatal opioid overdoses, and whether the pandemic moderated overdose risk in these groups.

METHODS

We analyzed New York State Medicaid claims data (3/1/2019-12/31/20) of patients with chronic pain (N = 236,391). We used generalized estimating equations models to assess associations between LTOT and/or OUD (neither LTOT or OUD [ref], LTOT only, OUD only, and LTOT and OUD) and the pandemic (03/2020-12/2020) with opioid overdose.

RESULTS

The pandemic did not significantly (ns) affect opioid overdose among patients with LTOT and/or OUD. While patients with LTOT (vs. no LTOT) had a slight increase in opioid overdose during the pandemic (pre-pandemic: aOR:1.65, 95% CI:1.05, 2.57; pandemic: aOR:2.43, CI:1.75,3.37, ns), patients with OUD had a slightly attenuated odds of overdose during the pandemic (pre-pandemic: aOR:5.65, CI:4.73, 6.75; pandemic: aOR:5.16, CI:4.33, 6.14, ns). Patients with both LTOT and OUD also experienced a slightly reduced odds of opioid overdose during the pandemic (pre-pandemic: aOR:5.82, CI:3.58, 9.44; pandemic: aOR:3.70, CI:2.11, 6.50, ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrated no significant effect of the pandemic on opioid overdose among people with chronic pain and LTOT and/or OUD, suggesting pandemic policies expanding access to chronic pain and OUD treatment services may have mitigated the risk of opioid overdose.

摘要

目的

新冠疫情导致慢性疼痛患者的医疗服务中断。在最初的中断之后,出台了国家政策,以扩大长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)的机会,用于慢性疼痛和阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的治疗服务,这可能改变了阿片类药物过量的风险。我们研究了 LTOT 和/或 OUD 与致命和非致命阿片类药物过量之间的关联,以及疫情是否改变了这些人群的过量风险。

方法

我们分析了纽约州医疗补助计划(3/1/2019-12/31/20)的慢性疼痛患者(N=236391)的数据。我们使用广义估计方程模型来评估 LTOT 和/或 OUD(既不是 LTOT 也不是 OUD[参考]、仅 LTOT、仅 OUD 和 LTOT 和 OUD)与疫情(2020 年 3 月至 12 月)之间的关联与阿片类药物过量。

结果

疫情并没有显著影响 LTOT 和/或 OUD 患者的阿片类药物过量。虽然 LTOT 患者(与没有 LTOT 的患者相比)在疫情期间阿片类药物过量略有增加(疫情前:aOR:1.65,95%CI:1.05,2.57;疫情期间:aOR:2.43,CI:1.75,3.37,无统计学意义),但 OUD 患者在疫情期间阿片类药物过量的可能性略有降低(疫情前:aOR:5.65,CI:4.73,6.75;疫情期间:aOR:5.16,CI:4.33,6.14,无统计学意义)。同时患有 LTOT 和 OUD 的患者在疫情期间阿片类药物过量的几率也略有降低(疫情前:aOR:5.82,CI:3.58,9.44;疫情期间:aOR:3.70,CI:2.11,6.50,无统计学意义)。

结论

研究结果表明,疫情对慢性疼痛患者、LTOT 和/或 OUD 患者的阿片类药物过量没有显著影响,这表明扩大慢性疼痛和 OUD 治疗服务机会的疫情政策可能降低了阿片类药物过量的风险。

相似文献

1
5
Removal of Medicaid Prior Authorization Requirements and Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Oct 6;4(10):e233549. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3549.
6
Association of Opioid Use Disorder Diagnosis with Management of Acute Low Back Pain: A Medicare Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(11):2097-2105. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08799-3. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
7
How Is Preoperative Opioid Use Associated With Readmissions and Outcomes in Lower Extremity Trauma?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):918-927. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003346. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
9
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on opioid overdose and other adverse events in the USA and Canada: a systematic review.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jan;48(1):37-43. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103591. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Tobacco, Alcohol, Cannabis, and Other Drug Use in the US Before and During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2254566. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54566.
2
Increased solitary drug use during COVID-19: An unintended consequence of social distancing.
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jan;111:103923. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103923. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
4
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022 Nov 4;71(3):1-95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1.
5
How COVID-19 shaped mental health: from infection to pandemic effects.
Nat Med. 2022 Oct;28(10):2027-2037. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02028-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
7
The impact of COVID-19 on patients with chronic pain seeking care at a tertiary pain clinic.
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 19;12(1):6435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10431-5.
8
Changes in Buprenorphine Prescribing to Medicaid Beneficiaries During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e224058. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4058.
9
Forecasted and Observed Drug Overdose Deaths in the US During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e223418. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3418.
10
Substitution of Nonpharmacologic Therapy With Opioid Prescribing for Pain During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138453. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38453.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验