Pastori Chiara, Nafie Ebtesam H O, Wagh Mukta S, Mammarappallil Joseph G, Neal Robert E
Department of Research, Galvanize Therapeutics, Redwood City, California.
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Mar;35(3):442-451.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
To compare the immune response and survival after size-matched radiofrequency (RF) ablation and a proprietary form of pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation in murine tumors.
Orthotopically inoculated EMT6 or 4T1 murine tumors received sham, RF ablation, or PEF ablation. 4T1 tumor ablations included subgroups with intraperitoneal checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy (αPD-1). Blood was collected for cytokine profiling and flow cytometry. Tumor size was measured and survival was monitored. Tumor samples were processed for histology, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and cytokine profiling. Lungs were collected from 4T1-bearing mice for hematoxylin and eosin histology to assess metastatic spread and abscopal effect induced by ablation.
PEF elicited distinct immunomodulatory effects, with clear differences in serum and tumor cytokine profiles compared with RF ablation, including intratumoral downregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, c-MET, interleukin-10, Ki67, and tumor necrosis factor-α (all P < .05). PEF increased innate immune activation, with enhanced recruitment of dendritic cells, M1 macrophages, and natural killer cells coupled with a reduction in M2 macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (all P < .05). Concurrently, PEF strengthened adaptive immunity compared with RF ablation, characterized by increased antigen-specific T cells and decreased regulatory T cells (all P < .05). PEF stalled tumor growth and increased survival at the end of the study (≥4× versus RFA). Finally, PEF promoted an abscopal effect of clearing metastases in the lungs, which was stronger in combination with αPD-1 than with PEF alone.
The proprietary form of PEF used in this study evoked a preferential immunostimulatory profile versus RF ablation thermal ablation in mice, with implications for enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness of checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy for immunotherapy-unresponsive tumors.
比较大小匹配的射频(RF)消融和一种专利形式的脉冲电场(PEF)消融在小鼠肿瘤中的免疫反应和生存率。
原位接种EMT6或4T1小鼠肿瘤后,分别接受假手术、RF消融或PEF消融。4T1肿瘤消融包括腹腔内检查点抑制免疫疗法(αPD-1)的亚组。采集血液进行细胞因子分析和流式细胞术检测。测量肿瘤大小并监测生存率。对肿瘤样本进行组织学、免疫组织化学、流式细胞术和细胞因子分析。从携带4T1肿瘤的小鼠中采集肺组织进行苏木精和伊红组织学检查,以评估消融诱导的转移扩散和远隔效应。
与RF消融相比,PEF引发了独特的免疫调节作用,血清和肿瘤细胞因子谱存在明显差异,包括肿瘤内血管内皮生长因子、缺氧诱导因子1α、c-MET、白细胞介素-10、Ki67和肿瘤坏死因子-α的下调(均P <.05)。PEF增强了先天免疫激活,树突状细胞、M1巨噬细胞和自然杀伤细胞的募集增加,同时M2巨噬细胞和髓源性抑制细胞减少(均P <.05)。同时,与RF消融相比,PEF增强了适应性免疫,表现为抗原特异性T细胞增加和调节性T细胞减少(均P <.05)。在研究结束时,PEF使肿瘤生长停滞并提高了生存率(与RFA相比≥4倍)。最后,PEF促进了肺部转移灶清除的远隔效应,与αPD-1联合使用时比单独使用PEF更强。
本研究中使用的专利形式的PEF与RF消融热消融相比,在小鼠中引发了优先的免疫刺激谱,这对于增强检查点抑制免疫疗法对免疫治疗无反应肿瘤的治疗效果具有重要意义。