Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2346094. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46094.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited activity in microsatellite-stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer. Recent findings suggest the efficacy of ICIs may be modulated by the presence of liver metastases (LM).
To investigate the association between the presence of LM and ICI activity in advanced MSS colorectal cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this secondary analysis of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO26 (CCTG CO.26) randomized clinical trial, patients with treatment-refractory colorectal cancer were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to durvalumab plus tremelimumab or best supportive care alone between August 10, 2016, and June 15, 2017. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) with 80% power and 2-sided α = .10. The median follow-up was 15.2 (0.2-22.0) months. In this post hoc analysis performed from February 11 to 14, 2022, subgroups were defined based on the presence or absence of LM and study treatments.
Durvalumab plus tremelimumab or best supportive care.
Hazard ratios (HRs) and 90% CIs were calculated based on a stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model. Plasma tumor mutation burden at study entry was determined using a circulating tumor DNA assay. The primary end point of the study was OS, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR).
Of 180 patients enrolled (median age, 65 [IQR, 36-87] years; 121 [67.2%] men; 19 [10.6%] Asian, 151 [83.9%] White, and 10 [5.6%] other race or ethnicity), LM were present in 127 (70.6%). For patients with LM, there was a higher proportion of male patients (94 of 127 [74.0%] vs 27 of 53 [50.9%]; P = .005), and the time from initial cancer diagnosis to study entry was shorter (median, 40 [range, 8-153] vs 56 [range, 14-181] months; P = .001). Plasma tumor mutation burden was significantly higher in patients with LM. Patients without LM had significantly improved PFS with durvalumab plus tremelimumab (HR, 0.54 [90% CI, 0.35-0.96]; P = .08; P = .02 for interaction). Disease control rate was 49% (90% CI, 36%-62%) in patients without LM treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab, compared with 14% (90% CI, 6%-38%) in those with LM (odds ratio, 5.70 [90% CI, 1.46-22.25]; P = .03). On multivariable analysis, patients without LM had significantly improved OS and PFS compared with patients with LM.
In this secondary analysis of the CCTG CO.26 study, the presence of LM was associated with worse outcomes for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients without LM had improved PFS and higher DCR with durvalumab plus tremelimumab. Liver metastases may be associated with poor outcomes of ICI treatment in advanced colorectal cancer and should be considered in the design and interpretation of future clinical studies evaluating this therapy.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在微卫星稳定(MSS)或错配修复功能完整(pMMR)结直肠癌中的活性有限。最近的研究结果表明,ICI 的疗效可能受到肝转移(LM)的影响。
研究晚期 MSS 结直肠癌中 LM 存在与 ICI 活性之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项加拿大癌症临床试验组 CO26(CCTG CO.26)的二次分析中,2016 年 8 月 10 日至 2017 年 6 月 15 日,对治疗耐药的结直肠癌患者进行了 2:1 的随机分组,分别接受 durvalumab 加 tremelimumab 或最佳支持治疗。主要终点是总生存期(OS),具有 80%的效力和双侧α=0.10。中位随访时间为 15.2(0.2-22.0)个月。在 2022 年 2 月 11 日至 14 日进行的这项事后分析中,根据 LM 的存在和研究治疗定义了亚组。
durvalumab 加 tremelimumab 或最佳支持治疗。
基于分层 Cox 比例风险回归模型计算了危险比(HR)和 90%CI。在研究开始时使用循环肿瘤 DNA 检测确定血浆肿瘤突变负担。该研究的主要终点是 OS,定义为从随机分组到任何原因死亡的时间;次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和疾病控制率(DCR)。
在纳入的 180 名患者中(中位年龄 65[IQR,36-87]岁;121[67.2%]为男性;19[10.6%]为亚洲人,151[83.9%]为白人,10[5.6%]为其他种族或民族),127 名(70.6%)患者存在 LM。对于有 LM 的患者,男性患者的比例较高(127 例中有 94 例[74.0%] vs 53 例中有 27 例[50.9%];P=0.005),从初始癌症诊断到研究开始的时间较短(中位数为 40[范围,8-153] vs 56[范围,14-181]个月;P=0.001)。LM 患者的血浆肿瘤突变负担显著更高。无 LM 的患者接受 durvalumab 加 tremelimumab治疗的 PFS 显著改善(HR,0.54[90%CI,0.35-0.96];P=0.08;P=0.02 用于交互作用)。无 LM 的患者接受 durvalumab 加 tremelimumab 治疗的疾病控制率为 49%(90%CI,36%-62%),而有 LM 的患者为 14%(90%CI,6%-38%)(比值比,5.70[90%CI,1.46-22.25];P=0.03)。多变量分析显示,与有 LM 的患者相比,无 LM 的患者 OS 和 PFS 均显著改善。
在这项 CCTG CO.26 研究的二次分析中,LM 的存在与晚期结直肠癌患者的不良结局相关。无 LM 的患者接受 durvalumab 加 tremelimumab 治疗的 PFS 改善和更高的 DCR。肝转移可能与晚期结直肠癌中 ICI 治疗的不良结局相关,在设计和解释未来评估这种治疗的临床试验时应考虑这一点。