Emergency Department Cardiac Risk Stratification With High-Sensitivity vs Conventional Troponin HEART Pathway.

IMPORTANCE

Patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain are routinely risk stratified for major adverse cardiac events using the HEART (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin) score pathway, which incorporates clinical features, risk factors, electrocardiography findings, and initial serum troponin testing. A new HEART pathway incorporating high-sensitivity troponin level may improve risk stratification among patients with possible acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

OBJECTIVE

To compare health outcomes and resource use among emergency department patients undergoing cardiac risk stratification with a HEART pathway using conventional vs high-sensitivity serum troponin.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter pre-post cohort study was conducted between January 1 and September 6, 2021, at 16 Kaiser Permanente Southern California hospitals during uptake of a high-sensitivity serum troponin assay and included 17 384 adult patients who presented to an emergency department with chest pain and were risk stratified with a HEART pathway based on conventional troponin or high-sensitivity troponin.

EXPOSURES

A HEART pathway incorporating either conventional or high-sensitivity serum troponin was used to stratify study groups for risk of major adverse cardiac events within 30 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was detection of AMI in the emergency department and within 30 days.

RESULTS

Of the 17 384 patients (median age, 58 years [IQR, 45-69 years]; 9767 women [56.2%]), 12 440 (71.6%) were risk stratified with a HEART pathway based on conventional troponin, and 4944 (28.4%) were risk stratified with a HEART pathway based on high-sensitivity troponin. Detection of AMI within 30 days was higher for the high-sensitivity troponin group than the conventional troponin group (288 [5.8%] vs 545 [4.4%]; P < .001), while the 30-day all-cause mortality rate was unchanged (16 [0.3%] vs 50 [0.4%]; P = .50). In the emergency department, 228 of 4944 patients (4.6%) in the high-sensitivity troponin group received a diagnosis of AMI compared with 251 of 12 440 patients (2.0%) in the conventional troponin group (P < .001). Among those who did not receive a diagnosis of AMI in the emergency department, an additional 60 patients (1.2%) in the high-sensitivity troponin group and 294 (2.4%) in the conventional troponin group (P < .001) received a diagnosis within 30 days. Patients in the high-sensitivity troponin group had lower rates of health care use compared with the conventional troponin group, including admission (605 [12.2%] vs 1862 [15.0%]; P < .001), stress testing within 7 days (506 [10.2%] vs 1591 [12.8%]; P < .001), and coronary revascularization within 30 days (51 [1.0%] vs 244 [2.0%]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This multicenter pre-post cohort study suggests that a new HEART pathway incorporating high-sensitivity troponin may improve detection of AMI and decrease resource use among emergency department patients with chest pain.