Suppr超能文献

临床环境中家用和办公室血压测量设备的比较。

Comparison of Home and Office Blood Pressure Devices in the Clinical Setting.

作者信息

Juraschek Stephen P, Vyavahare Medha, Cluett Jennifer L, Turkson-Ocran Ruth-Alma, Mukamal Kenneth J, Ishak Anthony M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2024 Apr 15;37(5):342-348. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad120.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring is increasingly used for remote hypertension management, but the real-world performance of home blood pressure (BP) devices is unknown. We examined BP measurements from patients' home devices using the American Medical Association's (AMA) SMBP Device Accuracy Test tool.

METHODS

Patients at a single internal medicine clinic underwent up to five seated, same-arm BP readings using a home device and an automated BP device (Omron HEM-907XL). Following the AMA's three-step protocol, we used the patient's home device for the first, second, and fourth measurements and the office device for the third and fifth (if needed) measurements. Device agreement failure was defined as an absolute difference in systolic BP >10 mm Hg between the home and office devices in either of two confirmatory steps. Performance was examined by brand (Omron vs. non-Omron). Moreover, we examined patient factors associated with agreement failure via logistic regression models adjusted for demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

We evaluated 152 patients (mean age 60 ± 15 years, 58% women, 31% Black) seen between October 2020 and November 2021. Device agreement failure occurred in 22.4% (95% CI: 16.4%, 29.7%) of devices tested, including 19.1% among Omron devices and 27.6% among non-Omron devices (P = 0.23). No patient characteristics were associated with agreement failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Over one-fifth of home devices did not agree based on the AMA SMBP device accuracy protocol. These findings confirm the importance of office-based device comparisons to ensure the accuracy of home BP monitoring.

摘要

背景

自测血压(SMBP)监测越来越多地用于远程高血压管理,但家用血压(BP)设备在现实世界中的性能尚不清楚。我们使用美国医学协会(AMA)的SMBP设备准确性测试工具检查了患者家用设备的血压测量值。

方法

一家内科诊所的患者使用家用设备和自动血压设备(欧姆龙HEM-907XL)进行了多达五次坐姿、同臂血压读数。按照AMA的三步协议,我们在第一次、第二次和第四次测量中使用患者的家用设备,在第三次和第五次(如有需要)测量中使用办公室设备。设备一致性失败定义为在两个确认步骤中的任何一个步骤中,家用设备和办公室设备之间的收缩压绝对差值>10 mmHg。按品牌(欧姆龙与非欧姆龙)检查性能。此外,我们通过针对人口统计学特征进行调整的逻辑回归模型检查了与一致性失败相关的患者因素。

结果

我们评估了2020年10月至2021年11月期间就诊的152名患者(平均年龄60±15岁,58%为女性,31%为黑人)。在测试的设备中,22.4%(95%CI:16.4%,29.7%)出现设备一致性失败,其中欧姆龙设备中为19.1%,非欧姆龙设备中为27.6%(P=0.23)。没有患者特征与一致性失败相关。

结论

根据AMA SMBP设备准确性协议,超过五分之一的家用设备不一致。这些发现证实了基于办公室的设备比较对于确保家庭血压监测准确性的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验