Suppr超能文献

扩大染色体微阵列分析在复发性流产评估中的作用。

Expanding the role of chromosomal microarray analysis in the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss.

作者信息

Eliwa Jasmine, Papas Ralph S, Kutteh William H

机构信息

Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center-Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.

Infertility Division, Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, St George Hospital - University Medical Center - University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

J Reprod Immunol. 2024 Feb;161:104188. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.104188. Epub 2023 Dec 28.

Abstract

Multiple factors contribute to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). This review highlights the latest international guidelines for RPL workup, including immunological testing, by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). These three societies recommend testing for antiphospholipid syndrome. ESHRE and RCOG also recommend thyroid peroxidase antibody testing, whereas ASRM does not. All guidelines advise against testing of natural killer cells, cytokines, antinuclear antibodies, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility, anti-HLA antibodies, and anti-sperm antibodies. However, when following ASRM, ESHRE or RCOG diagnostic guidelines, over 50% of cases have no identifiable cause. Genetic testing of products of conception (POC) can improve our understanding of unexplained RPL as aneuploidy is a common cause of RPL. Based on studies reporting results from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) of POC, we propose a novel algorithm for RPL evaluation. The algorithm involves following evidence-based societal guidelines (published by ASRM, ESHRE, or RCOG), excluding parental karyotyping, in combination with CMA testing of miscarriage tissue. When utilizing this new evaluation algorithm, the number of unexplained cases of RPL decreases from over 50% to less than 10%. As a result, most patients are provided an explanation for their loss and healthcare costs are potentially reduced. Patients with an otherwise negative workup with euploid POC, are classified as "truly unexplained RPL". These patients are excellent candidates for enrollment in randomized, controlled trials examining novel immunological testing and treatment protocols.

摘要

多种因素导致复发性流产(RPL)。本综述重点介绍了美国生殖医学学会(ASRM)、欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会(ESHRE)以及皇家妇产科学院(RCOG)发布的关于RPL检查(包括免疫检测)的最新国际指南。这三个学会均推荐进行抗磷脂综合征检测。ESHRE和RCOG还推荐检测甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体,而ASRM则不推荐。所有指南均建议不要检测自然杀伤细胞、细胞因子、抗核抗体、人类白细胞抗原(HLA)相容性、抗HLA抗体和抗精子抗体。然而,按照ASRM、ESHRE或RCOG的诊断指南进行检查时,超过50%的病例无法找出明确病因。对妊娠产物(POC)进行基因检测有助于我们更好地理解不明原因的RPL,因为非整倍体是RPL的常见病因。基于报告POC染色体微阵列分析(CMA)结果的研究,我们提出了一种用于RPL评估的新算法。该算法包括遵循循证性学会指南(由ASRM、ESHRE或RCOG发布),不包括父母核型分析,并结合对流产组织进行CMA检测。采用这种新的评估算法时,不明原因的RPL病例数从超过50%降至不到10%。因此,大多数患者能够得到流产原因的解释,医疗费用也可能降低。POC为整倍体且其他检查结果为阴性的患者被归类为“真正不明原因的RPL”。这些患者是参与研究新型免疫检测和治疗方案的随机对照试验的理想人选。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验