Wolf Steven P, Anastasopoulou Vasiliki, Drousch Kimberley, Diehl Markus I, Engels Boris, Yew Poh Yin, Kiyotani Kazuma, Nakamura Yusuke, Schreiber Karin, Schreiber Hans, Leisegang Matthias
Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 15;30(8):1642-1654. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2905.
To achieve eradication of solid tumors, we examined how many neoantigens need to be targeted with how many T-cell receptors (TCR) by which type of T cells.
Unmanipulated, naturally expressed (autochthonous) neoantigens were targeted with adoptively transferred TCR-engineered autologous T cells (TCR-therapy). TCR-therapy used CD8+ T-cell subsets engineered with TCRs isolated from CD8+ T cells (CD8+TCR-therapy), CD4+ T-cell subsets engineered with TCRs isolated from CD4+ T cells (CD4+TCR-therapy), or combinations of both. The targeted tumors were established for at least 3 weeks and derived from primary autochthonous cancer cell cultures, resembling natural solid tumors and their heterogeneity as found in humans.
Relapse was common with CD8+TCR-therapy even when targeting multiple different autochthonous neoantigens on heterogeneous solid tumors. CD8+TCR-therapy was only effective against homogenous tumors artificially derived from a cancer cell clone. In contrast, a combination of CD8+TCR-therapy with CD4+TCR-therapy, each targeting one neoantigen, eradicated large and established solid tumors of natural heterogeneity. CD4+TCR-therapy targeted a mutant neoantigen on tumor stroma while direct cancer cell recognition by CD8+TCR-therapy was essential for cure. In vitro data were consistent with elimination of cancer cells requiring a four-cell cluster composed of TCR-engineered CD4+ and CD8+ T cells together with antigen-presenting cells and cancer cells.
Two cancer-specific TCRs can be essential and sufficient to eradicate heterogeneous solid tumors expressing unmanipulated, autochthonous targets. We demonstrate that simplifications to adoptive TCR-therapy are possible without compromising efficacy.
为实现实体瘤的根除,我们研究了需要多少种新抗原被多少种T细胞受体(TCR)以及何种类型的T细胞靶向。
通过过继转移经TCR工程改造的自体T细胞(TCR疗法)靶向未经处理的、自然表达的(自身的)新抗原。TCR疗法使用从CD8 + T细胞分离的TCR工程改造的CD8 + T细胞亚群(CD8 + TCR疗法)、从CD4 + T细胞分离的TCR工程改造的CD4 + T细胞亚群(CD4 + TCR疗法)或两者的组合。靶向的肿瘤建立至少3周,源自原发性自体癌细胞培养物,类似于人类中发现的天然实体瘤及其异质性。
即使在异质性实体瘤上靶向多种不同的自体新抗原,CD8 + TCR疗法复发也很常见。CD8 + TCR疗法仅对人工从癌细胞克隆衍生的同质肿瘤有效。相比之下,CD8 + TCR疗法与CD4 + TCR疗法的组合,每种靶向一种新抗原,根除了具有天然异质性的大的、已建立的实体瘤。CD4 + TCR疗法靶向肿瘤基质上的突变新抗原,而CD8 + TCR疗法对癌细胞的直接识别对于治愈至关重要。体外数据与消除癌细胞需要由TCR工程改造的CD4 +和CD8 + T细胞以及抗原呈递细胞和癌细胞组成的四细胞簇一致。
两种癌症特异性TCR对于根除表达未经处理的、自体靶点的异质性实体瘤可能是必不可少且足够的。我们证明在不影响疗效的情况下简化过继性TCR疗法是可能的。