Robinson Jake M, Breed Andrew C, Camargo Araceli, Redvers Nicole, Breed Martin F
College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water, and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia; School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld, Australia.
Environ Res. 2024 Apr 1;246:118115. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118115. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
Mounting evidence supports the connections between exposure to environmental typologies(such as green and blue spaces)and human health. However, the mechanistic links that connect biodiversity (the variety of life) and human health, and the extent of supporting evidence remain less clear. Here, we undertook a scoping review to map the links between biodiversity and human health and summarise the levels of associated evidence using an established weight of evidence framework. Distinct from other reviews, we provide additional context regarding the environment-microbiome-health axis, evaluate the environmental buffering pathway (e.g., biodiversity impacts on air pollution), and provide examples of three under- or minimally-represented linkages. The examples are (1) biodiversity and Indigenous Peoples' health, (2) biodiversity and urban social equity, and (3) biodiversity and COVID-19. We observed a moderate level of evidence to support the environmental microbiota-human health pathway and a moderate-high level of evidence to support broader nature pathways (e.g., greenspace) to various health outcomes, from stress reduction to enhanced wellbeing and improved social cohesion. However, studies of broader nature pathways did not typically include specific biodiversity metrics, indicating clear research gaps. Further research is required to understand the connections and causative pathways between biodiversity (e.g., using metrics such as taxonomy, diversity/richness, structure, and function) and health outcomes. There are well-established frameworks to assess the effects of broad classifications of nature on human health. These can assist future research in linking biodiversity metrics to human health outcomes. Our examples of underrepresented linkages highlight the roles of biodiversity and its loss on urban lived experiences, infectious diseases, and Indigenous Peoples' sovereignty and livelihoods. More research and awareness of these socioecological interconnections are needed.
越来越多的证据支持接触环境类型(如绿地和蓝地)与人类健康之间的联系。然而,连接生物多样性(生命的多样性)与人类健康的机制联系以及相关证据的程度仍不太明确。在此,我们进行了一项范围综述,以梳理生物多样性与人类健康之间的联系,并使用既定的证据权重框架总结相关证据的水平。与其他综述不同的是,我们提供了关于环境 - 微生物组 - 健康轴的更多背景信息,评估了环境缓冲途径(例如生物多样性对空气污染的影响),并给出了三个研究不足或研究较少的联系实例。这些实例分别是:(1)生物多样性与原住民健康;(2)生物多样性与城市社会公平;(3)生物多样性与2019冠状病毒病。我们观察到有中等水平的证据支持环境微生物群与人类健康的途径,以及中等偏高水平的证据支持从减轻压力到增强幸福感和改善社会凝聚力等各种健康结果的更广泛自然途径(如绿地)。然而,对更广泛自然途径的研究通常没有纳入具体的生物多样性指标,这表明存在明显的研究空白。需要进一步研究以了解生物多样性(例如使用分类学、多样性/丰富度、结构和功能等指标)与健康结果之间的联系和因果途径。有完善的框架可用于评估自然的广泛分类对人类健康的影响。这些框架有助于未来将生物多样性指标与人类健康结果联系起来的研究。我们研究不足的联系实例突出了生物多样性及其丧失对城市生活体验、传染病以及原住民主权和生计的作用。需要对这些社会生态联系进行更多的研究并提高认识。