Suppr超能文献

度伐利尤单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆道癌。

Durvalumab plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

出版信息

NEJM Evid. 2022 Aug;1(8):EVIDoa2200015. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200015. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer have a poor prognosis, and first-line standard of care (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) has remained unchanged for more than 10 years. The TOPAZ-1 trial evaluated durvalumab plus chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, we randomly assigned patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer or with recurrent disease 1:1 to receive durvalumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab or placebo monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 685 patients were randomly assigned to durvalumab (n=341) or placebo (n=344) with chemotherapy. As of data cutoff, 198 patients (58.1%) in the durvalumab group and 226 patients (65.7%) in the placebo group had died. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.97; P=0.021). The estimated 24-month overall survival rate was 24.9% (95% CI, 17.9 to 32.5) for durvalumab and 10.4% (95% CI, 4.7 to 18.8) for placebo. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; P=0.001). Objective response rates were 26.7% with durvalumab and 18.7% with placebo. The incidences of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 75.7% and 77.8% with durvalumab and placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy and showed improvements versus placebo plus chemotherapy in prespecified secondary end points including progression-free survival and objective response rate. The safety profiles of the two treatment groups were similar. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03875235.)

摘要

背景

晚期胆道癌患者预后较差,一线标准治疗(吉西他滨联合顺铂) 10 多年来一直没有改变。TOPAZ-1 试验评估了 durvalumab 联合化疗治疗晚期胆道癌患者。

方法

在这项双盲、安慰剂对照、III 期研究中,我们将未经治疗的不可切除或转移性胆道癌或复发的患者按 1:1 随机分配接受 durvalumab 或安慰剂联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗,最多 8 个周期,然后接受 durvalumab 或安慰剂单药治疗,直到疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。主要终点是评估总生存期。次要终点包括无进展生存期、客观缓解率和安全性。

结果

共有 685 名患者随机分配至 durvalumab(n=341)或安慰剂(n=344)联合化疗组。截至数据截止时,durvalumab 组 198 名患者(58.1%)和安慰剂组 226 名患者(65.7%)死亡。总生存的风险比为 0.80(95%置信区间 [CI],0.66 至 0.97;P=0.021)。估计 durvalumab 的 24 个月总生存率为 24.9%(95%CI,17.9 至 32.5),安慰剂组为 10.4%(95%CI,4.7 至 18.8)。无进展生存期的风险比为 0.75(95%CI,0.63 至 0.89;P=0.001)。durvalumab 的客观缓解率为 26.7%,安慰剂组为 18.7%。durvalumab 组和安慰剂组的 3 级或 4 级不良事件发生率分别为 75.7%和 77.8%。

结论

与安慰剂联合化疗相比,durvalumab 联合化疗显著改善了总生存期,并在预先指定的次要终点(包括无进展生存期和客观缓解率)方面优于安慰剂联合化疗。两组的安全性特征相似。(由 AstraZeneca 资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT03875235)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验