Jalalifar Saba, Razavi Shabnam, Mirzaei Rasoul, Irajian Gholamreza, Pooshang Bagheri Kamran
Microbial Biotechnology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 1;14:1269392. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1269392. eCollection 2023.
The emergence and rapid spread of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial strains, such as methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant (VRSA), have posed a significant challenge to the medical community due to their ability to form biofilm and develop resistance to common antibiotics. Traditional antibiotics that were once effective in treating bacterial infections are now becoming increasingly ineffective, leading to severe consequences for patient outcomes. This concerning situation has called for urgent research to explore alternative treatment strategies. Recent studies have shown that antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) hold promise as effective agents against biofilm-associated drug-resistant infections as well as to enhance the efficacy of conventional antibiotics. Accordingly, we aimed to investigate the antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of melittin AMP, both alone and in combination with penicillin and oxacillin, against biofilm-forming MDR-MRSA and -VRSA.
In this study, we investigated the kinetics of biofilm formation and assessed various parameters related to the antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy of melittin and antibiotics, both alone and in combination, against MDR-MRSA and -VRSA. The antimicrobial parameters included the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICi), Fractional Bactericidal Concentration Index (FBCi), and the antibiofilm activity of melittin and antibiotics indicated by the Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration (MBIC), Minimal Biofilm Eradication Concentration (MBEC), Fractional Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration Index (FBICi), and Fractional Biofilm Eradication Concentration Index (FBECi).
The MIC results showed that all isolates were resistant to penicillin (≥0.25 μg/mL), and 66% of isolates were resistant to oxacillin. The geometric means of the MIC values for penicillin, oxacillin, and melittin were 19.02, 16, and 1.62 μg/ml, respectively, and the geometric means of the MBC values for penicillin, oxacillin, and melittin were 107.63, 49.35, and 5.45 μg/ml, respectively. The study revealed that the combination indexes of melittin-penicillin and melittin-oxacillin, as determined by FIC values against all isolates, were 0.37 and 0.03, respectively. Additionally, melittin-penicillin and melittin-oxacillin exhibited combination indexes based on FBC values against all isolates at 1.145 and 0.711, respectively. Besides, melittin inhibited the biofilm formation of all isolates, with MBIC values ranging from 10 to 1.25 μg/mL, and MBEC values ranging from 40 to 10 μg/mL. Generally, the combination indexes of melittin-penicillin and melittin-oxacillin, determined using FBIC values against all isolates, were 0.23 and 0.177, respectively. Moreover, melittin-penicillin and melittin-oxacillin typically had combination indexes based on FBEC values against all isolates at 5 and 2.97, respectively.
In conclusion, our study provides evidence that melittin is effective against both planktonik and biofilm forms of MRSA and VRSA and exhibits significant synergistic effects when combined with antibiotics. These results suggest that melittin and antibiotics could be a potential candidate for further investigation for infections caused by MDR Furthermore, melittin has the potential to restore the efficacy of penicillin and oxacillin antibiotics in the treatment of MDR infections. Applying AMPs, like melittin, to revive beta-lactam antibiotics against MRSA and VRSA is an innovative approach against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Further research is needed to optimize dosage and understand melittin mechanism and interactions with beta-lactam antibiotics for successful clinical applications.
耐多药(MDR)细菌菌株的出现和迅速传播,如耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素金黄色葡萄球菌(VRSA),因其形成生物膜和对常用抗生素产生耐药性的能力,给医学界带来了重大挑战。曾经有效治疗细菌感染的传统抗生素现在越来越无效,给患者的治疗结果带来了严重后果。这种令人担忧的情况促使人们迫切开展研究以探索替代治疗策略。最近的研究表明,抗菌肽(AMPs)有望成为对抗生物膜相关耐药感染以及提高传统抗生素疗效的有效药物。因此,我们旨在研究蜂毒肽单独以及与青霉素和苯唑西林联合使用时,对形成生物膜的MDR-MRSA和-VRSA的抗菌和抗生物膜作用。
在本研究中,我们研究了生物膜形成的动力学,并评估了蜂毒肽和抗生素单独及联合使用时,针对MDR-MRSA和-VRSA的抗菌和抗生物膜功效的各种参数。抗菌参数包括最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、最低杀菌浓度(MBC)、部分抑菌浓度指数(FICi)、部分杀菌浓度指数(FBCi),蜂毒肽和抗生素的抗生物膜活性通过最低生物膜抑制浓度(MBIC)、最低生物膜清除浓度(MBEC)、部分生物膜抑制浓度指数(FBICi)和部分生物膜清除浓度指数(FBECi)来表示。
MIC结果显示,所有分离株对青霉素均耐药(≥0.25μg/mL),66%的分离株对苯唑西林耐药。青霉素、苯唑西林和蜂毒肽的MIC值几何平均值分别为19.02、16和1.62μg/ml,青霉素、苯唑西林和蜂毒肽的MBC值几何平均值分别为107.63、49.35和5.45μg/ml。研究表明,根据针对所有分离株的FIC值确定,蜂毒肽-青霉素和蜂毒肽-苯唑西林的联合指数分别为0.37和0.03。此外,根据针对所有分离株的FBC值,蜂毒肽-青霉素和蜂毒肽-苯唑西林的联合指数分别为1.145和0.711。此外,蜂毒肽抑制了所有分离株的生物膜形成,MBIC值范围为10至1.25μg/mL,MBEC值范围为40至10μg/mL。一般来说,根据针对所有分离株的FBIC值确定,蜂毒肽-青霉素和蜂毒肽-苯唑西林的联合指数分别为0.23和0.177。此外,蜂毒肽-青霉素和蜂毒肽-苯唑西林根据针对所有分离株的FBEC值的联合指数通常分别为5和2.97。
总之,我们的研究提供了证据,表明蜂毒肽对MRSA和VRSA的浮游菌和生物膜形式均有效,并且与抗生素联合使用时表现出显著的协同作用。这些结果表明,蜂毒肽和抗生素可能是进一步研究耐多药感染的潜在候选药物。此外,蜂毒肽有可能恢复青霉素和苯唑西林抗生素在治疗耐多药感染中的疗效。应用像蜂毒肽这样的抗菌肽来恢复β-内酰胺类抗生素对MRSA和VRSA的疗效是一种针对耐药细菌的创新方法。需要进一步研究以优化剂量,并了解蜂毒肽的作用机制以及与β-内酰胺类抗生素的相互作用,以实现成功的临床应用。