Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Apr 15;468:133813. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133813. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
This systematic review addresses soil contamination by crude oil, a pressing global environmental issue, by exploring effective treatment strategies for sites co-contaminated with heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Our study aims to answer pivotal research questions: (1) What are the interaction mechanisms between heavy metals and PAHs in contaminated soils, and how do these affect the efficacy of different remediation methods? (2) What are the challenges and limitations of combined remediation techniques for co-contaminated soils compared to single-treatment methods in terms of efficiency, stability, and specificity? (3) How do various factors influence the effectiveness of biological, chemical, and physical remediation methods, both individually and combined, in co-contaminated soils, and what role do specific agents play in the degradation, immobilization, or removal of heavy metals and PAHs under diverse environmental conditions? (4) Do AI-powered search tools offer a superior alternative to conventional search methodologies for executing an exhaustive systematic review? Utilizing big-data analytics and AI tools such as Litmaps.co, ResearchRabbit, and MAXQDA, this study conducts a thorough analysis of remediation techniques for soils co-contaminated with heavy metals and PAHs. It emphasizes the significance of cation-π interactions and soil composition in dictating the solubility and behavior of these pollutants. The study pays particular attention to the interplay between heavy metals and PAH solubility, as well as the impact of soil properties like clay type and organic matter on heavy metal adsorption, which results in nonlinear sorption patterns. The research identifies a growing trend towards employing combined remediation techniques, especially biological strategies like biostimulation-bioaugmentation, noting their effectiveness in laboratory settings, albeit with potentially higher costs in field applications. Plants such as Medicago sativa L. and Solanum nigrum L. are highlighted for their effectiveness in phytoremediation, working synergistically with beneficial microbes to decompose contaminants. Furthermore, the study illustrates that the incorporation of biochar and surfactants, along with chelating agents like EDTA, can significantly enhance treatment efficiency. However, the research acknowledges that varying environmental conditions necessitate site-specific adaptations in remediation strategies. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) findings indicate that while high-energy methods like Steam Enhanced Extraction and Thermal Resistivity - ERH are effective, they also entail substantial environmental and financial costs. Conversely, Natural Attenuation, despite being a low-impact and cost-effective option, may require prolonged monitoring. The study advocates for an integrative approach to soil remediation, one that harmoniously balances environmental sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and the specific requirements of contaminated sites. It underscores the necessity of a holistic strategy that combines various remediation methods, tailored to meet both regulatory compliance and the long-term sustainability of decontamination efforts.
本系统评价针对原油污染土壤这一紧迫的全球环境问题,探讨了同时受到重金属和多环芳烃(PAHs)污染的场地的有效处理策略。我们的研究旨在回答关键研究问题:(1)污染土壤中重金属和 PAHs 的相互作用机制是什么,这些机制如何影响不同修复方法的效果?(2)与单一处理方法相比,联合修复技术在效率、稳定性和特异性方面用于共污染土壤的挑战和局限性是什么?(3)在共污染土壤中,各种因素如何影响生物、化学和物理修复方法的有效性,以及特定试剂在不同环境条件下对重金属和 PAHs 的降解、固定或去除的作用?(4)人工智能驱动的搜索工具在执行全面系统评价方面是否优于传统搜索方法?本研究利用大数据分析和人工智能工具(如 Litmaps.co、ResearchRabbit 和 MAXQDA),对同时受到重金属和 PAHs 污染的土壤修复技术进行了彻底分析。它强调了阳离子-π 相互作用和土壤组成在决定这些污染物的溶解度和行为方面的重要性。该研究特别关注重金属和 PAH 溶解度之间的相互作用,以及粘土类型和有机质等土壤特性对重金属吸附的影响,这导致了非线性吸附模式。研究发现,越来越倾向于采用联合修复技术,特别是生物策略,如生物刺激-生物增强,注意到它们在实验室环境中的有效性,尽管在现场应用中可能成本更高。突出了紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)和龙葵(Solanum nigrum L.)等植物在植物修复中的有效性,它们与有益微生物协同作用,分解污染物。此外,研究表明,生物炭和表面活性剂的加入,以及 EDTA 等螯合剂的使用,可以显著提高处理效率。然而,研究承认,不同的环境条件需要在修复策略中进行具体的适应性调整。生命周期评估(LCA)的结果表明,虽然像蒸汽强化提取和电阻率-ERH 这样的高能方法很有效,但它们也需要大量的环境和财务成本。相反,自然衰减虽然是一种低影响、具有成本效益的选择,但可能需要长期监测。该研究提倡采用一种综合的土壤修复方法,这种方法可以平衡环境可持续性、成本效益和污染场地的具体要求。它强调了需要采用一种综合的策略,结合各种修复方法,以满足法规遵从性和去污工作的长期可持续性。