Goudet Anna, Doré Chantal, Hyppolite Shelley-Rose, Lévesque Nancy, Joseph Jean-Alex, Maltais Danielle, Bourque Denis, Maillet Lara
National School of Public Administration, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Université de Sherbrooke, Institut Universitaire de première ligne en santé et services sociaux, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Health Serv Insights. 2024 Mar 11;17:11786329241234997. doi: 10.1177/11786329241234997. eCollection 2024.
Integrated Place-Based Primary Interventions (IPPIs) are considered an innovative response to the challenges and complex issues faced in disadvantaged areas where traditional institutional services have difficulty reaching people in vulnerable situations. IPPIs are an innovative approach to the delivery of in services, conceived as an original community-based local care and service pathways. However, these intervention practices require adaptive modes of governance. In this article, we explore how and to what extent the mode of governance of IPPIs influences the performance of community-integrated pathways. To this end, using a qualitative exploratory multiple-case study design (observation and semi-structured interviews), we describe 4 IPPIs in 3 territories in Quebec. This includes an examination of the levers of action and tensions related to their governance and the performance levels of the community-integrated pathways. We conclude that collaborative and shared multilevel governance, despite its demanding nature, appears to contribute to the longevity of the actions and benefits of IPPIs and could prevent their relevance from being questioned.
综合地方基层干预措施(IPPIs)被视为对弱势地区所面临挑战和复杂问题的一种创新应对方式,在这些地区,传统机构服务难以惠及弱势群体。IPPIs是一种提供服务的创新方法,被构想为基于社区的本地护理和服务路径。然而,这些干预措施需要适应性治理模式。在本文中,我们探讨IPPIs的治理模式如何以及在多大程度上影响社区综合路径的绩效。为此,我们采用定性探索性多案例研究设计(观察和半结构化访谈),描述了魁北克3个地区的4项IPPIs。这包括对与它们的治理相关的行动杠杆和紧张关系以及社区综合路径的绩效水平进行考察。我们得出结论,尽管协作性和共享性的多层次治理要求很高,但它似乎有助于IPPIs行动的持久性和益处,并能防止其相关性受到质疑。