Zhang Weiguo, Chen Peng, Huo Shaofeng, Huang Xiaomin, Zhao Youyou
Las Colinas Institutes, Irving, TX, United States.
Sirio Pharma, R&D, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Front Nutr. 2024 Feb 28;11:1363181. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1363181. eCollection 2024.
Caloric restriction (CR) or energy restriction, when carefully designed, monitored, and implemented in self-motivated and compliant individuals, proves to be a viable non-pharmacologic strategy for human weight control and obesity management. Beyond its role in weight management, CR has the potential to impede responses involved not only in the pathogenesis of various diseases but also in the aging process in adults, thereby being proposed to promote a healthier and longer life. The core objective of implementing caloric restriction is to establish a balance between energy intake and expenditure, typically involving a reduction in intake and an increase in expenditure-a negative balance at least initially. It may transition toward and maintain a more desired equilibrium over time. However, it is essential to note that CR may lead to a proportional reduction in micronutrient intake unless corresponding supplementation is provided. Historical human case reports on CR have consistently maintained adequate intakes (AI) or recommended dietary allowances (RDA) for essential micronutrients, including vitamins and minerals. Similarly, longevity studies involving non-human primates have upheld micronutrient consumption levels comparable to control groups or baseline measures. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have also endorsed daily supplementation of multivitamins and minerals to meet micronutrient needs. However, aside from these human case reports, limited human trials, and primate experiments, there remains a notable gap in human research specifically addressing precise micronutrient requirements during CR. While adhering to AI or RDA for minerals and vitamins appears sensible in the current practice, it's important to recognize that these guidelines are formulated for generally healthy populations under standard circumstances. The adequacy of these guidelines in the setting of prolonged and profound negative energy balance remains unclear. From perspectives of evidence-based medicine and precision nutrition, this field necessitates comprehensive exploration to uncover the intricacies of absorption, utilization, and metabolism and the requirement of each hydrophilic and lipophilic vitamin and mineral during these special periods. Such investigations are crucial to determine whether existing daily dietary recommendations for micronutrients are quantitatively inadequate, excessive, or appropriate when energy balance remains negative over extended durations.
热量限制(CR)或能量限制,在经过精心设计、监测并由有自我驱动力且依从性好的个体实施时,被证明是一种可行的非药物策略,可用于人类体重控制和肥胖管理。除了在体重管理方面的作用外,热量限制不仅有可能阻碍参与各种疾病发病机制的反应,还可能影响成年人的衰老过程,因此有人提出它能促进更健康、更长寿的生活。实施热量限制的核心目标是在能量摄入和消耗之间建立平衡,通常包括减少摄入量和增加消耗量——至少在开始时是负平衡。随着时间的推移,它可能会朝着并维持更理想的平衡状态转变。然而,必须注意的是,除非提供相应的补充,热量限制可能会导致微量营养素摄入量成比例减少。关于热量限制的人类历史病例报告一直保持对包括维生素和矿物质在内的必需微量营养素的充足摄入量(AI)或推荐膳食摄入量(RDA)。同样,涉及非人类灵长类动物的长寿研究也维持了与对照组或基线测量相当的微量营养素消费水平。最近的随机对照试验(RCT)也支持每日补充多种维生素和矿物质以满足微量营养素需求。然而,除了这些人类病例报告、有限的人体试验和灵长类动物实验外,在专门针对热量限制期间精确微量营养素需求的人体研究方面仍存在显著差距。虽然在当前实践中遵循矿物质和维生素的AI或RDA似乎是合理的,但重要的是要认识到这些指南是针对标准情况下一般健康人群制定的。在长期和深度负能量平衡的情况下,这些指南的充分性仍不明确。从循证医学和精准营养的角度来看,这个领域需要全面探索,以揭示在这些特殊时期每种亲水性和脂溶性维生素及矿物质的吸收、利用、代谢以及需求的复杂性。此类研究对于确定当能量平衡在较长时间内保持为负时,现有的微量营养素每日膳食建议在数量上是否不足、过量或合适至关重要。