Suppr超能文献

givinostat 在患有杜氏肌营养不良症(EPIDYS)男孩中的安全性和有效性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。

Safety and efficacy of givinostat in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (EPIDYS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Pediatric Neurology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Child Health Area, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Centro Clinico Nemo Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Servicio de Neurología, Neuromuscular Unit, CIBERER, EURO-RN-NMD, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Lancet Neurol. 2024 Apr;23(4):393-403. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00036-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the most common childhood muscular dystrophy, is caused by dystrophin deficiency. Preclinical and phase 2 study data have suggested that givinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, might help to counteract the effects of this deficiency. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of givinostat in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 41 tertiary care sites in 11 countries. Eligible participants were ambulant, male, and aged at least 6 years, had a genetically confirmed diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, completed two four-stair climb assessments with a mean of 8 s or less (≤1 s variance), had a time-to-rise of at least 3 s but less than 10 s, and had received systemic corticosteroids for at least 6 months. Participating boys were randomly assigned (2:1, allocated according to a list generated by the interactive response technology provider) to receive either oral givinostat or matching placebo twice a day for 72 weeks, stratified by concomitant steroid use. Boys, investigators, and site and sponsor staff were masked to treatment assignment. The dose was flexible, based on weight, and was reduced if not tolerated. Boys were divided into two groups on the basis of their baseline vastus lateralis fat fraction (VLFF; measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy): group A comprised boys with a VLFF of more than 5% but no more than 30%, whereas group B comprised boys with a VLFF of 5% or less, or more than 30%. The primary endpoint compared the effects of givinostat and placebo on the change in results of the four-stair climb assessment between baseline and 72 weeks, in the intention-to-treat, group A population. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned boys who received at least one dose of study drug. When the first 50 boys in group A completed 12 months of treatment, an interim futility assessment was conducted, after which the sample size was adapted using masked data from the four-stair climb assessments. Furthermore, the starting dose of givinostat was reduced following a protocol amendment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02851797, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between June 6, 2017, and Feb 22, 2022, 359 boys were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 179 were enrolled into the study (median age 9·8 years [IQR 8·1-11·0]), all of whom were randomly assigned (118 to receive givinostat and 61 to receive placebo); 170 (95%) boys completed the study. Of the 179 boys enrolled, 120 (67%) were in group A (81 givinostat and 39 placebo); of these, 114 (95%) completed the study. For participants in group A, comparing the results of the four-stair climb assessment at 72 weeks and baseline, the geometric least squares mean ratio was 1·27 (95% CI 1·17-1·37) for boys receiving givinostat and 1·48 (1·32-1·66) for those receiving placebo (ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·745-0·989; p=0·035). The most common adverse events in the givinostat group were diarrhoea (43 [36%] of 118 boys vs 11 [18%] of 61 receiving placebo) and vomiting (34 [29%] vs 8 [13%]); no treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Among ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, results of the four-stair climb assessment worsened in both groups over the study period; however, the decline was significantly smaller with givinostat than with placebo. The dose of givinostat was reduced after an interim safety analysis, but no new safety signals were reported. An ongoing extension study is evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of givinostat in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

FUNDING

Italfarmaco.

摘要

背景

杜氏肌营养不良症是最常见的儿童肌肉营养不良症,由肌营养不良蛋白缺乏引起。临床前和 2 期研究数据表明,组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂吉维司他可能有助于抵消这种缺乏的影响。我们旨在评估吉维司他治疗杜氏肌营养不良症的安全性和疗效。

方法

这项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期试验在 11 个国家的 41 个三级护理站点进行。符合条件的参与者为:男性,能独立行走,年龄至少 6 岁,经基因证实患有杜氏肌营养不良症,两次 4 级爬梯评估的平均时间均为 8 秒或更短(≤1 秒方差),起身时间至少为 3 秒但不到 10 秒,且至少接受了 6 个月的全身性皮质类固醇治疗。参与的男孩被随机分配(2:1,根据交互式响应技术提供商生成的列表分配),每天口服两次吉维司他或匹配的安慰剂,持续 72 周,分层因素为同时使用皮质类固醇。男孩、研究者、站点和赞助商工作人员对治疗分配进行了盲法。剂量是基于体重灵活调整的,如果不能耐受则减少剂量。根据基线股外侧肌脂肪分数(通过磁共振波谱测量),男孩被分为两组:A 组为股外侧肌脂肪分数超过 5%但不超过 30%的男孩,B 组为股外侧肌脂肪分数为 5%或更低或超过 30%的男孩。主要终点比较了吉维司他和安慰剂对意向治疗、A 组人群基线至 72 周期间 4 级爬梯评估结果变化的影响。在所有接受至少一剂研究药物的随机分配男孩中评估安全性。当 A 组的前 50 名男孩完成 12 个月的治疗时,进行了中期无效性评估,之后根据 4 级爬梯评估的盲法数据调整了样本量。此外,在方案修订后降低了吉维司他的起始剂量。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT02851797,已完成。

结果

2017 年 6 月 6 日至 2022 年 2 月 22 日,有 359 名男孩接受了资格评估。其中,179 名男孩入组研究(中位年龄 9.8 岁[IQR 8.1-11.0]),均被随机分配(118 名接受吉维司他,61 名接受安慰剂);170 名(95%)男孩完成了研究。在入组的 179 名男孩中,120 名(67%)在 A 组(81 名接受吉维司他,39 名接受安慰剂);其中 114 名(95%)完成了研究。对于 A 组的参与者,将 72 周和基线时的 4 级爬梯评估结果进行比较,接受吉维司他治疗的男孩的几何最小二乘均数比值为 1.27(95%CI 1.17-1.37),接受安慰剂治疗的男孩为 1.48(1.32-1.66)(比值 0.86,95%CI 0.745-0.989;p=0.035)。吉维司他组最常见的不良事件为腹泻(118 名男孩中有 43 名[36%],61 名接受安慰剂中有 11 名[18%])和呕吐(34 名[29%] vs 8 名[13%]);没有与治疗相关的死亡。

解释

在能独立行走的杜氏肌营养不良症男孩中,两组的 4 级爬梯评估结果在研究期间均恶化;然而,与安慰剂相比,吉维司他组的下降幅度明显较小。在中期安全性分析后,降低了吉维司他的剂量,但没有报告新的安全性信号。一项正在进行的扩展研究正在评估吉维司他在杜氏肌营养不良症患者中的长期安全性和疗效。

经费

Italfarmaco。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验