Alzoubi Hasan, Kabbani Samar, Taleb Ahmad, Bshara Nada, Altinawi Mohamed K, Almonakel Mohammed Bashier, Al Kurdi Saleh
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, SYR.
Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Damascus University, Damascus, SYR.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 24;16(2):e54825. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54825. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Background In pediatric dentistry, sedation aims to eliminate anxiety to facilitate the completion of dental procedures. Sedation in children is a multidimensional field that includes the child, parents/guardians, and the health care team. The rectal route is generally painless, making it suitable for children who are afraid of needles. This route has several advantages over the oral route, including reduced patient cooperation requirements, a faster and more predictable onset, and less physical trauma than the intravenous and intramuscular routes. This case series aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and success rate of rectal sedation with ketamine and midazolam in the management of uncooperative children during dental treatment. Case presentation Ten healthy children with definitely negative behavior were enrolled in this study. Each child was given 7 mg/kg of ketamine in combination with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg by the rectal route. The mean onset sedation time was 9.5 minutes, and pulpotomy procedures were done. Behavioral response was monitored throughout treatment using the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS), and the depth of sedation was measured using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). The Houpt General Behavior Scale was used to estimate the treatment success rate based on the overall behavior rating. All 10 cases showed good anxiolysis and cooperation following rectal administration, with no side effects observed. Conclusions Rectal administration of ketamine in combination with midazolam may be considered a reliable method in the management of uncooperative children during dental treatment. No adverse effects were observed during or after the sedation procedure.
背景 在儿童牙科中,镇静旨在消除焦虑以便于完成牙科治疗程序。儿童镇静是一个多维度领域,涉及儿童、父母/监护人以及医疗团队。直肠给药途径通常无痛,适用于害怕打针的儿童。该途径相较于口服途径有几个优点,包括对患者合作的要求降低、起效更快且更可预测,并且比静脉和肌肉注射途径造成的身体创伤更小。本病例系列旨在评估氯胺酮和咪达唑仑直肠镇静在牙科治疗中处理不合作儿童的有效性和成功率。
病例报告 十名具有明确负面行为的健康儿童纳入本研究。每个儿童通过直肠途径给予7mg/kg氯胺酮与0.1mg/kg咪达唑仑。平均镇静起效时间为9.5分钟,随后进行了牙髓切断术。在整个治疗过程中使用俄亥俄州立大学行为评定量表(OSUBRS)监测行为反应,并使用密歇根大学镇静量表(UMSS)测量镇静深度。根据总体行为评分,使用豪普特一般行为量表来评估治疗成功率。所有10例在直肠给药后均表现出良好的抗焦虑效果和合作性,未观察到副作用。
结论 在牙科治疗中,氯胺酮与咪达唑仑直肠给药可被视为处理不合作儿童的一种可靠方法。在镇静过程中及之后均未观察到不良反应。