Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Providence St Joseph Health-Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 May;6(5):e309-e322. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00021-9.
In the context of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), COVID-19 outcomes are incompletely understood and vary considerably depending on the patient population studied. We aimed to analyse severe COVID-19 outcomes and to investigate the effects of the pandemic time period and the risks associated with individual IMIDs, classes of immunomodulatory medications (IMMs), chronic comorbidities, and COVID-19 vaccination status.
In this retrospective cohort study, clinical data were derived from the electronic health records of an integrated health-care system serving patients in 51 hospitals and 1085 clinics across seven US states (Providence St Joseph Health). Data were observed for patients (no age restriction) with one or more IMID and for unmatched controls without IMIDs. COVID-19 was identified with a positive nucleic acid amplification test result for SARS-CoV-2. Two timeframes were analysed: March 1, 2020-Dec 25, 2021 (pre-omicron period), and Dec 26, 2021-Aug 30, 2022 (omicron-predominant period). Primary outcomes were hospitalisation, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Factors, including IMID diagnoses, comorbidities, long-term use of IMMs, and COVID-19 vaccination status, were analysed with multivariable logistic regression (LR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB).
Of 2 167 656 patients tested for SARS-CoV-2, 290 855 (13·4%) had confirmed COVID-19: 15 397 (5·3%) patients with IMIDs and 275 458 (94·7%) without IMIDs. In the pre-omicron period, 169 993 (11·2%) of 1 517 295 people who were tested for COVID-19 tested positive, of whom 23 330 (13·7%) were hospitalised, 1072 (0·6%) received mechanical ventilation, and 5294 (3·1%) died. Compared with controls, patients with IMIDs and COVID-19 had higher rates of hospitalisation (1176 [14·6%] vs 22 154 [13·7%]; p=0·024) and mortality (314 [3·9%] vs 4980 [3·1%]; p<0·0001). In the omicron-predominant period, 120 862 (18·6%) of 650 361 patients tested positive for COVID-19, of whom 14 504 (12·0%) were hospitalised, 567 (0·5%) received mechanical ventilation, and 2001 (1·7%) died. Compared with controls, patients with IMIDs and COVID-19 (7327 [17·3%] of 42 249) had higher rates of hospitalisation (13 422 [11·8%] vs 1082 [14·8%]; p<0·0001) and mortality (1814 [1·6%] vs 187 [2·6%]; p<0·0001). Age was a risk factor for worse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [OR] from 2·1 [95% CI 2·0-2·1]; p<0·0001 to 3·0 [2·9-3·0]; p<0·0001), whereas COVID-19 vaccination (from 0·082 [0·080-0·085]; p<0·0001 to 0·52 [0·50-0·53]; p<0·0001) and booster vaccination (from 2·1 [2·0-2·2]; p<0·0001 to 3·0 [2·9-3·0]; p<0·0001) status were associated with better outcomes. Seven chronic comorbidities were significant risk factors during both time periods for all three outcomes: atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, and cancer. Two IMIDs, asthma (adjusted OR from 0·33 [0·32-0·34]; p<0·0001 to 0·49 [0·48-0·51]; p<0·0001) and psoriasis (from 0·52 [0·48-0·56] to 0·80 [0·74-0·87]; p<0·0001), were associated with a reduced risk of severe outcomes. IMID diagnoses did not appear to be significant risk factors themselves, but results were limited by small sample size, and vasculitis had high feature importance in LR. IMMs did not appear to be significant, but less frequently used IMMs were limited by sample size. XGB outperformed LR, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for models across different time periods and outcomes ranging from 0·77 to 0·92.
Our results suggest that age, chronic comorbidities, and not being fully vaccinated might be greater risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with IMIDs than the use of IMMs or the IMIDs themselves. Overall, there is a need to take age and comorbidities into consideration when developing COVID-19 guidelines for patients with IMIDs. Further research is needed for specific IMIDs (including IMID severity at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection) and IMMs (considering dosage and timing before a patient's first COVID-19 infection).
Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, and the National Institutes of Health.
在免疫介导的炎症性疾病(IMIDs)的背景下,COVID-19 的结果尚不完全清楚,并且因所研究的患者人群而异。我们旨在分析严重 COVID-19 的结果,并研究大流行期间的影响以及个别 IMIDs、免疫调节药物(IMMs)类别、慢性合并症和 COVID-19 疫苗接种状况的风险。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,临床数据来自服务于美国七个州的 51 家医院和 1085 家诊所的综合医疗保健系统的电子健康记录(普罗维登斯圣约瑟夫健康)。观察了患有一种或多种 IMID 且无 IMIDs 的匹配对照患者的数据。COVID-19 通过 SARS-CoV-2 的核酸扩增检测结果呈阳性来识别。分析了两个时间段:2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 25 日(奥密克戎前时期)和 2021 年 12 月 26 日至 2022 年 8 月 30 日(奥密克戎主导时期)。主要结果是 COVID-19 患者的住院、机械通气和死亡率。使用多变量逻辑回归(LR)和极端梯度提升(XGB)分析包括 IMID 诊断、合并症、长期使用 IMM 和 COVID-19 疫苗接种状况在内的因素。
在 2167656 名接受 SARS-CoV-2 检测的患者中,290855 人(13.4%)确诊为 COVID-19:15397 名患者患有 IMIDs,275458 名患者无 IMIDs。在奥密克戎前时期,在 1517295 名接受 COVID-19 检测的人中,有 169993 人(11.2%)检测结果呈阳性,其中 23330 人(13.7%)住院,1072 人(0.6%)接受机械通气,5294 人(3.1%)死亡。与对照组相比,患有 IMIDs 和 COVID-19 的患者住院率(1176[14.6%]与 22154[13.7%];p=0.024)和死亡率(314[3.9%]与 4980[3.1%];p<0.0001)更高。在奥密克戎主导时期,在 650361 名接受 COVID-19 检测的人中,有 120862 人(18.6%)检测结果呈阳性,其中 14504 人(12.0%)住院,567 人(0.5%)接受机械通气,2001 人(1.7%)死亡。与对照组相比,患有 IMIDs 和 COVID-19 的患者(42249 名中的 7327 名)住院率(13422[11.8%]与 1082[14.8%];p<0.0001)和死亡率(1814[1.6%]与 187[2.6%];p<0.0001)更高。年龄是预后不良的危险因素(调整后的比值比[OR]从 2.1[95%CI 2.0-2.1];p<0.0001 至 3.0[2.9-3.0];p<0.0001),而 COVID-19 疫苗接种(从 0.082[0.080-0.085];p<0.0001 至 0.52[0.50-0.53];p<0.0001)和加强针接种(从 2.1[2.0-2.2];p<0.0001 至 3.0[2.9-3.0];p<0.0001)状态与更好的结果相关。七个慢性合并症在两个时期都是所有三个结局的显著危险因素:心房颤动、冠状动脉疾病、心力衰竭、慢性肾脏病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、慢性肝病和癌症。两种 IMIDs,哮喘(调整后的 OR 从 0.33[0.32-0.34];p<0.0001 至 0.49[0.48-0.51];p<0.0001)和银屑病(从 0.52[0.48-0.56]至 0.80[0.74-0.87];p<0.0001)与严重结局的风险降低相关。IMID 诊断本身似乎不是显著的危险因素,但结果受到小样本量的限制,血管炎在 LR 中的特征重要性较高。IMM 似乎并不重要,但使用频率较低的 IMM 受到样本量的限制。XGB 优于 LR,不同时间段和结局的模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积范围为 0.77 至 0.92。
我们的研究结果表明,年龄、慢性合并症以及未完全接种疫苗可能是患有 IMIDs 的 COVID-19 患者发生严重后果的比 IMMs 或 IMIDs 本身更大的危险因素。总体而言,在为患有 IMIDs 的患者制定 COVID-19 指南时,需要考虑年龄和合并症。还需要进一步研究特定的 IMIDs(包括 SARS-CoV-2 感染时的 IMID 严重程度)和 IMMs(考虑剂量和患者首次 COVID-19 感染前的时间)。
辉瑞、诺华、杨森和美国国立卫生研究院。