Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Health Ministry of Turkish Republic Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Department of Medical Microbiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Jul 1;79(7):1540-1546. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae125.
With the rise in antimicrobial resistance, there is a growing demand for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST). In this study, we applied the EUCAST RAST method to ESBL/carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates without using advanced identification systems and analysed the effect of this method on mortality rates Also the clinical impact of this method on patients infected with these bacteria and its effect on mortality rates were investigated.
RAST was used for clinical blood cultures containing carbapenemase/ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae without advanced identification systems (e.g. MALDI TOF), with preliminary identification by simple diagnostic tests (predicted RAST, or p-RAST), and its categorical agreement was investigated. The impact of the method on mortality was analysed by comparing the clinical data of patients whose blood cultures were subject to p-RAST (p-RAST group, n = 49) and those who were not subject to p-RAST (non-RAST group, n = 145).
p-RAST results were analysed based on 539 antibiotic-bacteria combinations. Total error rates at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were 2.9%, 3.9% and 3.8%, respectively. In the p-RAST group, patients who did not receive appropriate antibiotics (29/45, 59.1%) were switched to appropriate treatment within 8 h at the latest. In contrast, in the non-RAST group, treatment of patients who received inappropriate antibiotics (79/145, 54.5%) could be changed after at least 24 h. Mortality rates were lower in the p-RAST group than in the non-RAST group (28.6% versus 51.7%, P = 0.005).
p-RAST can be used safely in hospital laboratories with high rates of antimicrobial resistance and can reduce mortality rates by shortening the transition time to appropriate treatment.
随着抗菌药物耐药性的增加,对抗微生物药物敏感性快速检测(RAST)的需求日益增长。本研究应用 EUCAST RAST 方法检测未经先进鉴定系统鉴定的产 ESBL/碳青霉烯酶大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分离株,并分析该方法对死亡率的影响。此外,还研究了该方法对感染这些细菌的患者的临床影响及其对死亡率的影响。
对未经先进鉴定系统(如基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱)的含产碳青霉烯酶/ESBL 大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的临床血培养物,应用 RAST 检测,采用简单诊断试验(预测 RAST,p-RAST)进行初步鉴定,并对其分类一致性进行了研究。通过比较血培养物进行 p-RAST(p-RAST 组,n=49)和未进行 p-RAST(非 p-RAST 组,n=145)的患者的临床数据,分析该方法对死亡率的影响。
基于 539 种抗生素-细菌组合对 p-RAST 结果进行了分析。孵育 4、6 和 8 h 时总错误率分别为 2.9%、3.9%和 3.8%。在 p-RAST 组中,未接受适当抗生素治疗的患者(29/45,59.1%)最晚可在 8 h 内转换为适当治疗。相比之下,在非 p-RAST 组中,至少在 24 h 后才能改变接受不适当抗生素治疗的患者(79/145,54.5%)的治疗。p-RAST 组的死亡率低于非 p-RAST 组(28.6%比 51.7%,P=0.005)。
p-RAST 可安全应用于具有较高抗菌药物耐药率的医院实验室,通过缩短向适当治疗的过渡时间来降低死亡率。