Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100037, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 May 26;14(1):12018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63058-z.
Socioeconomic status (SES) has been linked to mortality rates, with family income being a quantifiable marker of SES. However, the precise association between the family income-to-poverty ratio (PIR) and all-cause mortality in adults aged 40 and older remains unclear. A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from NHANES III, including 20,497 individuals. The PIR was used to assess financial status, and various demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors were considered. Mortality data were collected from the NHANES III linked mortality file. The study revealed a non-linear association between PIR and all-cause mortality. The piecewise Cox proportional hazards regression model showed an inflection point at PIR 3.5. Below this threshold, the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.91), while above 3.5, the HR decreased to 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.76). Participants with lower income had a higher probability of all-cause mortality, with middle-income and high-income groups showing lower multivariate-adjusted HRs compared to the low-income group. This study provides evidence of a non-linear association between PIR and all-cause mortality in adults aged 40 and older, with an inflection point at PIR 3.5. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the non-linear relationship between family income and mortality when addressing socioeconomic health disparities.
社会经济地位(SES)与死亡率有关,家庭收入是 SES 的一个可量化指标。然而,家庭收入与贫困比率(PIR)与 40 岁及以上成年人全因死亡率之间的确切关联尚不清楚。本研究使用 NHANES III 数据进行了一项横断面研究,共纳入 20497 名个体。采用 PIR 评估经济状况,并考虑了各种人口统计学、生活方式和临床因素。死亡率数据来自 NHANES III 链接死亡率文件。研究显示,PIR 与全因死亡率之间呈非线性关联。分段 Cox 比例风险回归模型显示,PIR 为 3.5 时有一个拐点。在该阈值以下,全因死亡率的风险比(HR)为 0.85(95%CI 0.79-0.91),而在 3.5 以上,HR 降至 0.66(95%CI 0.57-0.76)。收入较低的参与者全因死亡率的可能性更高,与低收入组相比,中高收入组的多变量调整 HR 较低。本研究提供了证据表明,40 岁及以上成年人的 PIR 与全因死亡率之间存在非线性关联,在 PIR 为 3.5 时有一个拐点。这些发现强调了在解决社会经济健康差异时,考虑家庭收入与死亡率之间非线性关系的重要性。