Suppr超能文献

度伐利尤单抗或安慰剂联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆道癌(TOPAZ-1):一项随机 3 期研究的更新总生存期数据。

Durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): updated overall survival from a randomised phase 3 study.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, South Korea.

Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug;9(8):694-704. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00095-5. Epub 2024 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the preplanned interim analysis of the TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to report updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1 with additional follow-up and data maturity beyond the interim analysis.

METHODS

TOPAZ-1 was a phase 3, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, global study done at 105 sites in 17 countries. Participants aged 18 years or older with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin or placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin using a computer-generated randomisation scheme, stratified by disease status and primary tumour location. Participants received durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) and cisplatin (25 mg/m) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Investigators and participants were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. TOPAZ-1 met its primary endpoint at the preplanned interim analysis, and the study is active but no longer recruiting participants. Updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1, with additional follow-up (data cutoff Feb 25, 2022) and data maturity beyond the interim analysis, are reported here. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment). The TOPAZ-1 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03875235.

FINDINGS

From April 16, 2019, to Dec 11, 2020, 914 participants were enrolled, 685 of whom were randomly assigned (341 to the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 344 to the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group). 345 (50%) participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Median follow-up at the updated data cutoff was 23·4 months (95% CI 20·6-25·2) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 22·4 months (21·4-23·8) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. At the updated data cutoff, 248 (73%) participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 279 (81%) participants in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group had died (median overall survival 12·9 months [95% CI 11·6-14·1] vs 11·3 months [10·1-12·5]; hazard ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·64-0·91]). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 24-month overall survival rates were 23·6% (95% CI 18·7-28·9) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 11·5% (7·6-16·2) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. Maximum grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 250 (74%) of 338 participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 257 (75%) of 342 in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. The most common maximum grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (70 [21%] vs 86 [25%]), anaemia (64 [19%] vs 64 [19%]), and neutropenia (63 [19%] vs 68 [20%]).

INTERPRETATION

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin showed robust and sustained overall survival benefit with no new safety signals. Findings continue to support the regimen as a standard of care for people with untreated, advanced biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

摘要

背景

在 TOPAZ-1 研究的预先计划的中期分析中,与安慰剂加吉西他滨-顺铂相比,durvalumab 加吉西他滨-顺铂显著改善了晚期胆道癌患者的总生存期。我们旨在报告 TOPAZ-1 的更新的总生存期和安全性数据,这些数据是在中期分析之外进行了额外的随访和数据成熟度分析。

方法

TOPAZ-1 是一项在全球 17 个国家的 105 个地点进行的 3 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的研究。年龄在 18 岁或以上、无法切除的局部晚期或转移性胆道癌患者按疾病状态和原发肿瘤位置分层,以 1:1 的比例随机分配至 durvalumab 加吉西他滨-顺铂组或安慰剂加吉西他滨-顺铂组。患者每 3 周接受 durvalumab(1500mg)或安慰剂一次,持续 8 个周期,每个周期的第 1 天和第 8 天静脉注射吉西他滨(1000mg/m2)和顺铂(25mg/m2),持续 8 个周期,随后durvalumab(1500mg)或安慰剂每 4 周一次,直到疾病进展或其他停药标准。研究者和患者对研究治疗均设盲。主要终点是总生存期。TOPAZ-1 在预先计划的中期分析中达到了主要终点,该研究目前仍在进行中,但不再招募参与者。在此报告中,更新了来自 TOPAZ-1 的总生存期和安全性数据,这些数据是在中期分析之外进行了额外的随访(数据截止日期为 2022 年 2 月 25 日)和数据成熟度分析。疗效在全分析集(所有随机分配的参与者)中进行评估。安全性在安全性分析集(所有接受至少一剂研究治疗的参与者)中进行评估。TOPAZ-1 研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT03875235。

结果

从 2019 年 4 月 16 日至 2020 年 12 月 11 日,共纳入 914 名参与者,其中 685 名被随机分配(341 名接受 durvalumab 加吉西他滨-顺铂治疗,344 名接受安慰剂加吉西他滨-顺铂治疗)。345 名(50%)参与者为男性,340 名(50%)为女性。在更新的数据截止日期时,durvalumab 加吉西他滨-顺铂组的中位随访时间为 23.4 个月(95%CI 20.6-25.2),安慰剂加吉西他滨-顺铂组为 22.4 个月(21.4-23.8)。在更新的数据截止日期时,durvalumab 加吉西他滨-顺铂组有 248 名(73%)参与者和安慰剂加吉西他滨-顺铂组有 279 名(81%)参与者死亡(中位总生存期 12.9 个月[95%CI 11.6-14.1]vs 11.3 个月[10.1-12.5];风险比 0.76[95%CI 0.64-0.91])。Kaplan-Meier 估计的 24 个月总生存率分别为 durvalumab 加吉西他滨-顺铂组 23.6%(95%CI 18.7-28.9)和安慰剂加吉西他滨-顺铂组 11.5%(7.6-16.2)。最大等级 3 或 4 级不良事件发生在 durvalumab 加吉西他滨-顺铂组的 338 名参与者中有 250 名(74%),安慰剂加吉西他滨-顺铂组的 342 名参与者中有 257 名(75%)。最常见的最大等级 3 或 4 级与治疗相关的不良事件是中性粒细胞计数降低(70[21%]vs 86[25%])、贫血(64[19%]vs 64[19%])和中性粒细胞减少(63[19%]vs 68[20%])。

解释

与安慰剂加吉西他滨-顺铂相比,durvalumab 加吉西他滨-顺铂显示出稳健且持续的总生存期获益,且无新的安全性信号。这些发现继续支持该方案作为未经治疗的晚期胆道癌患者的标准治疗方案。

资金来源

阿斯利康。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验