Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (J.L.).
Food Is Medicine Institute Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (D.M.).
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jul;177(7):841-850. doi: 10.7326/M24-0190. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
Few data have assessed trends in diet quality among U.S. adults.
To evaluate trends in diet quality by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic disadvantage.
Repeated cross-sectional study.
United States.
Noninstitutionalized adults aged 20 years or older who responded to the 1999-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
The proportion of participants meeting the targets of the validated American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 continuous diet score (based on higher intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish and shellfish, and nuts, seeds, and legumes and lower intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, processed meat, saturated fat, and sodium) and the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, and energy-adjusted consumption of their components and other individual food groups and nutrients. Poor diet was defined as less than 40% adherence to the AHA score, intermediate as 40% to 79.9% adherence, and ideal as at least 80% adherence.
A total of 51 703 adults were included. From 1999 to 2020, the proportion of U.S. adults with poor diet quality decreased from 48.8% to 37.4% (difference, -11.4 percentage points [95% CI, -16.8 to -5.96 percentage points]), the proportion with intermediate quality increased from 50.6% to 61.1% (difference, 10.5 percentage points [CI, 5.20 to 16.1 percentage points]), and the proportion with ideal quality increased from 0.66% to 1.58% (difference, 0.93 percentage points [CI, 0.35 to 1.51 percentage points]) ( for trend < 0.001 for each). Persistent or worsening disparities in diet quality were observed by age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, income, food security, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation, and health insurance coverage. For example, the proportion of adults with poor diet quality decreased from 47.9% to 33.0% among those with food security ( for trend < 0.001) but did not change (51.3% to 48.2%) among those experiencing food insecurity ( for trend = 0.140) ( for interaction = 0.001). Findings were similar for HEI-2015.
Self-reported diet; cross-sectional study design.
Diet quality among U.S. adults improved modestly between 1999 and 2020, but the proportion with poor diet quality remains high, and dietary disparities persist or are worsening.
National Institutes of Health.
很少有数据评估美国成年人饮食质量的趋势。
评估按种族、族裔和社会经济劣势划分的饮食质量趋势。
重复的横断面研究。
美国。
回应 1999-2020 年全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)的 20 岁或以上的非住院成年人。
符合验证后的美国心脏协会(AHA)2020 年连续饮食评分目标的参与者比例(基于更高的水果、蔬菜、全谷物、鱼贝类、坚果、种子和豆类的摄入量,以及更低的含糖饮料、加工肉类、饱和脂肪和钠的摄入量)和健康饮食指数(HEI)-2015,以及其成分和其他个别食物组和营养素的能量调整后消耗量。不良饮食被定义为对 AHA 评分的依从性低于 40%,中等依从性为 40%至 79.9%,理想依从性为至少 80%。
共纳入 51703 名成年人。从 1999 年到 2020 年,美国成年人饮食质量差的比例从 48.8%下降到 37.4%(差异,-11.4 个百分点[95%置信区间,-16.8 至-5.96 个百分点]),中等质量的比例从 50.6%增加到 61.1%(差异,10.5 个百分点[CI,5.20 至 16.1 个百分点]),高质量的比例从 0.66%增加到 1.58%(差异,0.93 个百分点[CI,0.35 至 1.51 个百分点])(趋势检验<0.001)。按年龄、性别、种族和民族、教育程度、收入、粮食安全状况、补充营养援助计划参与情况以及医疗保险覆盖情况观察到饮食质量持续或恶化的差异。例如,在有粮食安全的成年人中,饮食质量差的比例从 47.9%下降到 33.0%(趋势检验<0.001),但在粮食不安全的成年人中没有变化(51.3%至 48.2%)(趋势检验=0.140)(交互检验=0.001)。HEI-2015 的结果也相似。
自我报告的饮食;横断面研究设计。
1999 年至 2020 年间,美国成年人的饮食质量有所改善,但饮食质量差的比例仍然很高,饮食差异持续存在或有所恶化。
美国国立卫生研究院。