Suppr超能文献

表面形貌对种植体周围炎的影响小于患者因素:两种牙科种植系统的对比临床研究。

Surface Topography Has Less Influence on Peri-Implantitis than Patient Factors: A Comparative Clinical Study of Two Dental Implant Systems.

机构信息

Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway.

Institute of Community Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway.

出版信息

ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024 Jul 8;10(7):4562-4574. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01809. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the risk of peri-implantitis (PI) onset among different implant systems and evaluate the severity of the disease from a population of patients treated in a university clinic. Furthermore, this study intends to thoroughly examine the surface properties of the implant systems that have been identified and investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from a total of six hundred and 14 patients were extracted from the Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo. Subject- and implant-based variables were collected, including the type of implant, date of implant installation, medical records, recall appointments up to 2022, periodontal measurements, information on diabetes, smoking status, sex, and age. The outcome of interest was the diagnosis of PI, defined as the occurrence of bleeding on probing (BoP), peri-implant probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm, and bone loss (BL). Data were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regression. Scanning electron microscopy, light laser profilometer, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were utilized for surface and chemical analyses.

RESULTS

Among the patients evaluated, 6.8% were diagnosed with PI. A comparison was made between two different implant systems: Dentsply Sirona, OsseospeedTM and Straumann SLActive, with mean follow-up times of 3.84 years (SE: 0.15) and 3.34 years (SE: 0.15), respectively. The surfaces have different topographies and surface chemistry. However, no significant association was found between PI and implant surface/system, including no difference in the onset or severity of the disease. Nonetheless, plaque control was associated with an increased risk of developing PI, along with the gender of the patient. Furthermore, patients suffering from PI exhibited increased BL in the anterior region.

CONCLUSION

No differences were observed among the evaluated implant systems, although the surfaces have different topography and chemistry. Factors that affected the risk of developing PI were plaque index and male gender. The severity of BL in patients with PI was more pronounced in the anterior region. Consequently, our findings show that success in implantology is less contingent on selecting implant systems and more on a better understanding of patient-specific risk factors, as well as on implementing biomaterials that can more effectively debride dental implants.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估不同种植系统发生种植体周围炎(PI)的风险,并从大学诊所治疗的患者群体中评估疾病的严重程度。此外,本研究旨在彻底检查已确定和研究的种植系统的表面特性。

材料和方法

从奥斯陆大学牙科学院临床牙科学研究所共提取了 614 名患者的数据。收集了基于患者和种植体的变量,包括种植体类型、种植体植入日期、病历、截至 2022 年的复诊预约、牙周测量值、糖尿病信息、吸烟状况、性别和年龄。感兴趣的结果是 PI 的诊断,定义为探诊出血(BoP)、种植体探诊深度(PD)≥5mm 和骨丧失(BL)的发生。使用多元线性和逻辑回归分析数据。使用扫描电子显微镜、轻激光轮廓仪和 X 射线光电子能谱对表面和化学进行分析。

结果

在评估的患者中,有 6.8%被诊断为 PI。比较了两种不同的种植系统:Dentsply Sirona,OsseospeedTM 和 Straumann SLActive,平均随访时间分别为 3.84 年(SE:0.15)和 3.34 年(SE:0.15)。这些表面具有不同的形貌和表面化学性质。然而,PI 与种植体表面/系统之间没有发现显著关联,包括疾病的发病或严重程度没有差异。尽管如此,菌斑控制与 PI 发病风险增加相关,以及患者的性别。此外,患有 PI 的患者在前区的 BL 增加。

结论

尽管表面具有不同的形貌和化学性质,但评估的种植系统之间没有差异。影响 PI 发病风险的因素是菌斑指数和男性性别。患有 PI 的患者在前区的 BL 严重程度更为明显。因此,我们的研究结果表明,种植体成功与否较少取决于选择种植系统,而更多地取决于更好地了解患者特定的风险因素,以及使用能够更有效地清除牙种植体的生物材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48b8/11234333/af43eb272d59/ab3c01809_0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验