Ouyang Mingyu, Wu Fangrong, Hu Changmin
College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 30;13(6):508. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060508.
As the clinical application of antibiotics for bacterial skin infections in companion animals becomes increasingly prevalent, the issue of bacterial resistance has become more pronounced. Antimicrobial peptides, as a novel alternative to traditional antibiotics, have garnered widespread attention. In our study, synthetic peptides ADD-A and CBD3-ABU were tested against skin infections in KM mice. ADD-A was applied topically and through intraperitoneal injection, compared with control groups and treatments including CBD3-ABU, ampicillin sodium, and saline. Wound contraction, bacterial counts and histology were assessed on days 3 and 11 post-infection. ADD-A and ampicillin treatments significantly outperformed saline in wound healing ( < 0.0001 and < 0.001, respectively). ADD-A also showed a markedly lower bacterial count than ampicillin ( < 0.0001). Histologically, ADD-A-applied wounds had better epidermal continuity and a thicker epidermis than normal, with restored follicles and sebaceous glands. ADD-A's effectiveness suggests it as a potential alternative to antibiotics for treating skin infections in animals.
随着抗生素在伴侣动物细菌性皮肤感染中的临床应用日益普遍,细菌耐药性问题变得更加突出。抗菌肽作为传统抗生素的一种新型替代品,已受到广泛关注。在我们的研究中,对合成肽ADD-A和CBD3-ABU进行了针对KM小鼠皮肤感染的测试。将ADD-A通过局部应用和腹腔注射给药,与包括CBD3-ABU、氨苄西林钠和生理盐水在内的对照组及治疗组进行比较。在感染后第3天和第11天评估伤口收缩、细菌计数和组织学情况。ADD-A和氨苄西林治疗在伤口愈合方面显著优于生理盐水(分别为<0.0001和<0.001)。ADD-A的细菌计数也明显低于氨苄西林(<0.0001)。组织学上,应用ADD-A的伤口具有比正常情况更好的表皮连续性和更厚的表皮,毛囊和皮脂腺得以恢复。ADD-A的有效性表明它有可能成为治疗动物皮肤感染的抗生素替代品。