Suppr超能文献

连续流左心室辅助装置植入术后持续性血管麻痹的预测因素及影响

Predictors and Impact of Prolonged Vasoplegia After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

作者信息

Lamba Harveen K, Kim Mary, Li Meng, Civitello Andrew B, Nair Ajith P, Simpson Leo, Herlihy J Patrick, Frazier O H, Rogers Joseph G, Loor Gabriel, Liao Kenneth K, Shafii Alexis E, Chatterjee Subhasis

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

JACC Adv. 2024 Mar 26;3(5):100916. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100916. eCollection 2024 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vasoplegia after cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcomes. However, the clinical effects of vasoplegia and the significance of its duration after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation are less known.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify predictors of and outcomes from transient vs prolonged vasoplegia after CF-LVAD implantation.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017. Vasoplegia was defined as the presence of all of the following: mean arterial pressure ≤65 mm Hg, vasopressor (epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, or dopamine) use for >6 hours within the first 24 hours postoperatively, cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min/m and systemic vascular resistance <800 dyne/s/cm, and vasodilatory shock not attributable to other causes. Prolonged vasoplegia was defined as that lasting 12 to 24 hours; transient vasoplegia was that lasting 6 to <12 hours. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 600 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation during the study period, 182 (30.3%) developed vasoplegia. Mean patient age was similar between the vasoplegia and no-vasoplegia groups. Prolonged vasoplegia (n = 78; 13.0%), compared with transient vasoplegia (n = 104; 17.3%), was associated with greater 30-day mortality (16.7% vs 5.8%;  = 0.02). Risk factors for prolonged vasoplegia included preoperative dialysis and elevated body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with vasoplegia overall, prolonged vasoplegia was associated with worse survival after CF-LVAD implantation. Treatment to avoid or minimize progression to prolonged vasoplegia may be warranted.

摘要

背景

心脏手术后血管麻痹与不良预后相关。然而,血管麻痹的临床影响及其在连续流左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)植入术后持续时间的意义尚鲜为人知。

目的

本研究旨在确定CF-LVAD植入术后短暂性与持续性血管麻痹的预测因素及预后情况。

方法

本研究是对2005年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间连续接受CF-LVAD植入术的患者进行的回顾性研究。血管麻痹定义为同时具备以下所有情况:平均动脉压≤65 mmHg、术后24小时内使用血管升压药(肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素、血管加压素或多巴胺)超过6小时、心脏指数≥2.2 L/min/m且全身血管阻力<800达因/秒/厘米,以及排除其他原因导致的血管舒张性休克。持续性血管麻痹定义为持续12至24小时;短暂性血管麻痹定义为持续6至<12小时。分析患者特征、预后及危险因素。

结果

在研究期间接受CF-LVAD植入术的600例患者中,182例(30.3%)发生了血管麻痹。血管麻痹组与无血管麻痹组患者的平均年龄相似。与短暂性血管麻痹(n = 104;17.3%)相比,持续性血管麻痹(n = 78;13.0%)与30天死亡率更高相关(16.7%对5.8%;P = 0.02)。持续性血管麻痹的危险因素包括术前透析和体重指数升高。

结论

与总体血管麻痹相比,CF-LVAD植入术后持续性血管麻痹与较差的生存率相关。可能有必要采取治疗措施以避免或尽量减少进展为持续性血管麻痹。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验