Suppr超能文献

加纳南部和北部地区的一些实验室在血液学检测结果方面缺乏共识。

Lack of consensus in inter-laboratory haematology results in selected laboratories in the southern and northern zones of Ghana.

机构信息

Department of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

出版信息

Ghana Med J. 2023 Sep;57(3):210-217. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v57i3.8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the inter-laboratory comparability and intra-assay reproducibility of full blood count (FBC) results.

DESIGN

Exploratory cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Three and two selected medical laboratories in the northern and southern zones, respectively.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-nine individuals per zone; 16 type 2 diabetes mellitus, 16 with HbAS haemoglobin type and 17 normal samples.

INTERVENTION

Each sample was run eleven times through the analysers in the participating laboratories to evaluate intra-laboratory reproducibility and comparability of FBC results.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Intra-laboratory reproducibility was evaluated using %coefficient variation (%CV). Interlaboratory comparisons were assessed through t-test or One-Way ANOVA for two-sample and three-sample tests. All statistical testing was undertaken using the two-tailed assumption.

RESULT

Statistically significantly different haemoglobin levels were estimated in both northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.00 g/dL to 3.75 g/dL vs 0.18 g/dL to 1.92 g/dL respectively). Also, total WBC counts significantly differed across laboratories in both northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.15 ×10/L - 3.86 ×10/L vs 0.02 ×10/L to 1.39 ×10/L respectively). Furthermore, platelet counts significantly differed across the participating laboratories in the northern and southern zones (mean difference 0.40 ×10/L to 299.76 ×10/L vs 5.7 ×10/L to 76.9 ×10/L respectively). Moreover, there was evidence of non-reproducibility of results within the respective laboratories in each zone as the respective %CV were outside the acceptable limits.

CONCLUSION

The intra-laboratory non-reproducibility and inter-laboratory non-comparability of FBC results highlight the need to establish a national quality assessment scheme to harmonise laboratory practices nationwide.

FUNDING

This study was funded by the University of Cape Coast Individual-Led Research Support Grant (RSG-INDI-CoHAS-2019-107).

摘要

目的

评估全血细胞计数(FBC)结果的实验室间可比性和室内精密度。

设计

探索性横断面研究。

地点

分别在北部和南部两个选定的医疗实验室。

参与者

每个区域各 49 人;16 例 2 型糖尿病患者,16 例血红蛋白 AS 型,17 例正常样本。

干预措施

每个样本在参与实验室的分析仪上运行 11 次,以评估室内精密度和 FBC 结果的可比性。

主要观察指标

室内精密度用变异系数(%CV)评估。通过 t 检验或 One-Way ANOVA 对两样本和三样本检验进行实验室间比较。所有统计检验均采用双侧假设。

结果

北部和南部区域均估计出血红蛋白水平存在统计学显著差异(平均差异分别为 0.00 g/dL 至 3.75 g/dL 与 0.18 g/dL 至 1.92 g/dL)。此外,北部和南部区域的总白细胞计数在实验室间也存在显著差异(平均差异分别为 0.15×10/L 至 3.86×10/L 与 0.02×10/L 至 1.39×10/L)。此外,北部和南部区域的血小板计数在参与实验室间也存在显著差异(平均差异分别为 0.40×10/L 至 299.76×10/L 与 5.7×10/L 至 76.9×10/L)。此外,由于各自区域的 %CV 超出可接受范围,表明各实验室内部结果的重复性不可靠。

结论

FBC 结果的实验室内部重复性和实验室间可比性差,突出表明需要建立国家质量评估计划,以协调全国范围内的实验室实践。

资金

本研究由开普敦大学个人领导研究支持赠款(RSG-INDI-CoHAS-2019-107)资助。

相似文献

4
Review of full blood count reference interval using a large cohort of first-time plasmapheresis blood donors.
Pathology. 2021 Jun;53(4):498-502. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
Characteristics of the external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for haematology in Spain.
Qual Assur Health Care. 1991;3(2):75-83. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/3.2.75.
6
Indirect reference intervals for haematological parameters in capillary blood of pre-school children.
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010709. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010709.
7
Evaluation of the QBC Star centrifugal three-part differential haematology system.
Br J Biomed Sci. 2013;70(2):67-74. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2013.11669938.
8
Comparison of haemoglobin assessments by HemoCue and two automated haematology analysers in young Laotian children.
J Clin Pathol. 2018 Jun;71(6):532-538. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204786. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
10
Establishing pregnancy-specific haematological reference intervals in Ghana; a three-center cross-sectional study.
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 3;18(2):e0274422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274422. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
ICSH recommendations for modified and alternate methods measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2017 Oct;39(5):448-457. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12693. Epub 2017 May 12.
2
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
3
Verification and standardization of blood cell counters for routine clinical laboratory tests.
Clin Lab Med. 2015 Mar;35(1):183-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
5
The role of proficiency testing in achieving standardization and harmonization between laboratories.
Clin Biochem. 2009 Mar;42(4-5):232-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.09.004.
8
External Quality Assessment: an effective tool for Clinical Governance in laboratory medicine.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(6):740-9. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.133.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验