Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Tohno Chuo Clinic, Mizunami, Gifu, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2024 Sep;47(9):2435-2446. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01762-z. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
The EXCITE-HT study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus thiazide diuretics (trichlormethiazide) as second-line treatment for Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was confirmed if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) change between groups was below 3.9/2.1 mmHg. A total of 295 and 290 patients were included in the esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide groups, respectively. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was demonstrated: least squares mean change differences in morning home SBP/DBP at end of treatment (EOT) were -2.2 (95% CI, -3.6, -0.8) mmHg for SBP/-0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) mmHg for DBP. Morning home, bedtime home, and office BP significantly decreased (all p < 0.001) from baseline to EOT in both groups. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level decreased from baseline to Week 12 in both groups, with no notable intergroup difference. Serum potassium elevations occurred more frequently with esaxerenone, while serum potassium reductions occurred more with trichlormethiazide. Uric acid elevations were observed in both groups, but more frequently with trichlormethiazide than esaxerenone. No cases of gout occurred in this study. Reductions in estimated glomerular filtration rate were similarly observed in both groups. EXCITE-HT is the first randomized controlled study to demonstrate evidence that esaxerenone is non-inferior to trichlormethiazide as second-line treatment for Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension, with no new safety concerns. The EXCITE-HT study demonstrated the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in its morning home blood pressure lowering effect and safety profile in Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension who were previously treated with an angiotensin II receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker.
EXCITE-HT 研究旨在评估依折麦布对比噻嗪类利尿剂(三氯甲噻嗪)作为二线治疗药物用于治疗未控制的原发性高血压日本患者的疗效和安全性。这是一项为期 12 周、多中心、随机、开放标签、平行组研究。如果组间收缩压(SBP)/舒张压(DBP)变化差值的双侧 95%置信区间(CI)上限低于 3.9/2.1mmHg,则确认依折麦布对比三氯甲噻嗪具有非劣效性。依折麦布组和三氯甲噻嗪组分别纳入 295 例和 290 例患者。研究证实了依折麦布对比三氯甲噻嗪的非劣效性:治疗结束时(EOT)早晨家庭 SBP/DBP 的最小二乘均值变化差异为 SBP-2.2mmHg(95%CI,-3.6,-0.8),DBP-0.6mmHg(-1.4,0.2)。两组患者的早晨家庭、睡前家庭和诊室血压均从基线显著下降(均 P<0.001)。两组患者的尿白蛋白/肌酐比值和 N 末端脑钠肽前体水平均从基线下降至第 12 周,组间无显著差异。依折麦布组血清钾升高更常见,而三氯甲噻嗪组血清钾降低更常见。两组均观察到血尿酸升高,但三氯甲噻嗪组比依折麦布组更常见。本研究中未发生痛风病例。两组患者的估算肾小球滤过率均有下降。EXCITE-HT 是第一项随机对照研究,证明了依折麦布作为二线治疗药物用于治疗先前接受血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂或钙通道阻滞剂治疗的未控制原发性高血压日本患者与三氯甲噻嗪相比不劣效,且无新的安全性担忧。EXCITE-HT 研究证实了依折麦布在其降低清晨家庭血压的效果和安全性方面与三氯甲噻嗪相比不劣效,适用于未控制的原发性高血压日本患者。