Suppr超能文献

加拿大婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒疾病预防用 RSVpreF 疫苗和 nirsevimab 的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccine and nirsevimab for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in Canadian infants.

机构信息

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Health Policy PhD Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2024 Aug 30;42(21):126164. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126164. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health Canada recently authorized the RSVpreF pregnancy vaccine and nirsevimab to protect infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF and nirsevimab programs in preventing RSV disease in infants, compared to a palivizumab program.

METHODS

We used a static cohort model of a Canadian birth cohort during their first RSV season to estimate sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for nine strategies implemented over a one-year time period, from the health system and societal perspectives. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties on the results.

RESULTS

All-infants nirsevimab programs averted more RSV-related outcomes than year-round RSVpreF programs, with the most RSV cases averted in a seasonal nirsevimab program with catch-up. Assuming list prices for these immunizing agents, all-infants nirsevimab and year-round RSVpreF programs were never cost-effective, with ICERs far exceeding commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Seasonal nirsevimab with catch-up for infants born outside the RSV season was a cost-effective program if prioritized for infants at moderate/high-risk (ICER <$28,000 per QALY) or those living in settings with higher RSV burden and healthcare costs, such as remote communities where transport would be complex (ICER of $5700 per QALY). Using a $50,000 per QALY threshold, an all-infants nirsevimab program could be optimal if nirsevimab is priced at <$110-190 per dose. A year-round RSVpreF for all pregnant women and pregnant people plus nirsevimab for infants at high-risk was optimal if nirsevimab is priced at >$110-190 per dose and RSVpreF priced at <$60-125 per dose.

INTERPRETATION

Prophylactic interventions can substantially reduce RSV disease in infants, and more focused nirsevimab programs are the most cost-effective option at current product prices.

摘要

背景

加拿大卫生部最近批准了 RSVpreF 孕期疫苗和 nirsevimab,以保护婴儿免受呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)疾病的侵害。

目的

评估 RSVpreF 和 nirsevimab 方案在预防婴儿 RSV 疾病方面的成本效益,与 palivizumab 方案相比。

方法

我们使用加拿大一个出生队列的静态队列模型,在 RSV 季节期间估计了九个策略在 2023 年加元每质量调整生命年(QALY)的序贯增量成本效益比(ICER),这些策略在一年的时间内从卫生系统和社会角度实施。进行了敏感性和情景分析,以探讨不确定性对结果的影响。

结果

所有婴儿 nirsevimab 方案比全年 RSVpreF 方案能预防更多的 RSV 相关结局,在季节性 nirsevimab 方案中,通过追赶免疫能预防最多的 RSV 病例。假设这些免疫制剂的定价,所有婴儿 nirsevimab 和全年 RSVpreF 方案都不是具有成本效益的,ICER 远远超过常用的成本效益阈值。对于出生在 RSV 季节之外的婴儿,季节性 nirsevimab 与追赶免疫是一种具有成本效益的方案,如果优先考虑中/高风险的婴儿(ICER<28000 加元/QALY)或那些生活在 RSV 负担和医疗保健成本较高的环境中的婴儿,例如交通复杂的偏远社区(每 QALY 成本效益为 5700 加元)。如果 nirsevimab 的价格低于 110-190 加元/剂,使用 50000 加元/QALY 的阈值,所有婴儿 nirsevimab 方案可能是最优的。如果 nirsevimab 的价格高于 110-190 加元/剂,RSVpreF 对所有孕妇和高风险孕妇以及婴儿进行全年接种,nirsevimab 的价格低于 60-125 加元/剂,则 RSVpreF 对所有孕妇和高风险孕妇以及婴儿进行全年接种是最优的。

解释

预防干预措施可以显著降低婴儿 RSV 疾病的发生率,在当前产品价格下,更有针对性的 nirsevimab 方案是最具成本效益的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验