Suppr超能文献

中软毛牙刷在菌斑清除和控制牙龈炎方面的比较功效。

Comparative Efficacy of Medium and Soft Toothbrushes in Plaque Removal and Gingivitis Control.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics and Community Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2024 Aug 16;30:e945395. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945395.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Regularly removing dental plaque is key to good oral hygiene and gingival health promotion. This study aimed to compare the effects of using soft and medium toothbrushes using the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) index. MATERIAL AND METHODS A randomized parallel-group study design was used. Sixty-four participants were randomly assigned to 2 similar intervention groups (medium and soft toothbrush groups). The PI, GI, and BOP indexes were used. The median and median difference of PI, GI, and BOP were calculated. SPSS was used for data entry and analysis. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS The median scores of GI, PI, and BOP significantly decreased from 1.8, 1.7, and 2.0, respectively, before using medium toothbrushes to 0.0, 0.1, and 0.0, respectively, after using medium toothbrushes (all P<0.0001). Similarly, the median scores of GI, PI, and BOP significantly decreased from 2.0, 1.7, and 2.0, respectively, before using soft toothbrushes to 1.1, 0.9, and 1.0, respectively, after using soft toothbrushes (P<0.0001). The median differences in GI, PI, and BOP scores among those using medium toothbrushes were higher than the median differences among those using soft toothbrushes [(1.8 vs 0.9), (1.6 vs 0.8), and (2.0 vs 1.0), respectively]. These differences were statistically significant (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This study concludes that medium and soft toothbrushes were effective in removing plaque and controlling gingivitis. Medium toothbrushes were more effective than soft toothbrushes in achieving these outcomes.

摘要

背景

定期清除牙菌斑是保持良好口腔卫生和促进牙龈健康的关键。本研究旨在比较使用软毛和中毛牙刷对菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊出血(BOP)指数的影响。

材料和方法

采用随机平行组设计。将 64 名参与者随机分为 2 个相似的干预组(中毛牙刷组和软毛牙刷组)。使用 PI、GI 和 BOP 指数。计算 PI、GI 和 BOP 的中位数和中位数差值。使用 SPSS 录入和分析数据。采用 Wilcoxon 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行数据分析。

结果

使用中毛牙刷后,GI、PI 和 BOP 的中位数评分分别从 1.8、1.7 和 2.0 显著下降至 0.0、0.1 和 0.0(均 P<0.0001)。同样,使用软毛牙刷后,GI、PI 和 BOP 的中位数评分分别从 2.0、1.7 和 2.0 显著下降至 1.1、0.9 和 1.0(均 P<0.0001)。使用中毛牙刷的 GI、PI 和 BOP 评分中位数差值高于使用软毛牙刷的评分中位数差值[(1.8 vs 0.9)、(1.6 vs 0.8)和(2.0 vs 1.0)]。这些差异具有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。

结论

本研究表明,中毛和软毛牙刷都能有效去除牙菌斑和控制牙龈炎。中毛牙刷在达到这些效果方面比软毛牙刷更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验