Suppr超能文献

全腹结肠切除术与结肠灌洗回肠造口术治疗暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎:结局的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。

Total abdominal colectomy versus diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage for fulminant clostridium difficile colitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Beirut, Lebanon.

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 6;409(1):272. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03458-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Diverting Loop Ileostomy (DLI) with intraoperative colonic lavage has emerged as a potential alternative to Total Abdominal Colectomy (TAC) for treating Fulminant Clostridium Difficile Colitis (FCDC). This study aims to provide an updated review comparing DLI with TAC in managing FCDC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to identify retrospective and prospective studies comparing DLI with TAC for fulminant CDC treatment. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate postoperative mortality rates and complications using R Studio version 4.4.1, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals via the Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I statistics.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 228 relevant citations, of which 7 studies with a total of 7,048 patients were included. Of these, 1,728 underwent DLI. The mean age was 63.33 years in the DLI group and 65.74 years in the TAC group. Compared to TAC, DLI had significantly lower postoperative mortality (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62-0.90; P = 0.002; I = 34%). Trial sequential analysis for postoperative mortality rates showed the benefit of DLI with a sufficiently powered sample. The DLI group also had a significantly higher rate of ostomy reversal (OR 5.68; 95% CI 2.35-13.72; P < 0.001; I = 36%). Postoperative complications, such as thromboembolic events, surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, renal failure, and pneumonia, were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

DLI shows a lower postoperative mortality rate and higher ostomy reversal rate than TAC, suggesting it as a potential organ-preserving, minimally invasive alternative. Further high-quality studies and trials are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

术中结肠灌洗的转流回肠造口术(DLI)已成为治疗暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎(FCDC)的一种潜在替代全腹部结肠切除术(TAC)的方法。本研究旨在提供一项比较 DLI 与 TAC 治疗 FCDC 的更新综述。

方法

使用 PubMed、Scopus 和 Embase 进行系统文献检索,以确定比较 DLI 与 TAC 治疗暴发性 CDC 的回顾性和前瞻性研究。使用 R Studio 版本 4.4.1 进行荟萃分析,使用 Mantel-Haenszel 方法计算术后死亡率和并发症的优势比(OR),并计算 95%置信区间。使用 Cochrane Q 检验和 I 统计评估异质性。

结果

我们的搜索共产生了 228 篇相关文献,其中 7 项研究共纳入了 7048 名患者。其中,1728 名患者接受了 DLI。DLI 组的平均年龄为 63.33 岁,TAC 组为 65.74 岁。与 TAC 相比,DLI 的术后死亡率显著降低(OR 0.75;95%CI 0.62-0.90;P=0.002;I=34%)。术后死亡率的试验序贯分析显示 DLI 具有足够效力的样本的获益。DLI 组的造口逆转率也显著更高(OR 5.68;95%CI 2.35-13.72;P<0.001;I=36%)。血栓栓塞事件、手术部位感染、尿路感染、肾衰竭和肺炎等术后并发症无显著差异。

结论

DLI 与 TAC 相比,术后死亡率较低,造口逆转率较高,表明其是一种潜在的保留器官、微创的替代方法。需要进一步开展高质量的研究和试验来证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验